Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)

2. Exactly

Reply to bitterross (Reply #1)

Fri Feb 16, 2018, 09:56 PM

Feb 2018

Cruz is merely an example. Kagen's ruling is also a little off to me. I realize she was operating under the "18 as adult" constraint, but that last sentence in the passage really stands out for me. In the Cruz example, we are talking about someone whose trouble began before he was 18, and continues still.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Juvenile Mental Health [View all] ProudLib72 Feb 2018 OP

If we are going to pick an aribtrary age, 25 is more appropriate. bitterross Feb 2018 #1

Exactly ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #2

My take is colored by having a schizophrenic brother. bitterross Feb 2018 #3

My take is colored by having a major bout of depression when I was 19 - 20 ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #4

Shameless kick ProudLib72 Feb 2018 #5