Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

herding cats

(20,050 posts)
37. Let me refresh the post you responded to in your memory.
Fri Feb 16, 2018, 11:01 PM
Feb 2018

Me:

The Russians encouraging people to vote third party to sway our election.

That is not democracy.

People who think third parties serve a purpose other than a spoiler candidate in a presidential election are deluding themselves.


You:

Do you think America should be unique in the Western world in only having a choice of two?

Would you be happy to only have a choice of only two cars? Two types of beer? Two types of clothes? The idea that there should be only two is not delusional.


Me:

Thats all irrelevant to our current situation.

Pretending things are other than they are changes nothing and opens doors to atrocities such as Trump.


Nope not seeing anything you’re saying as factually representing our current political system, nor do I see it as being relevant. We’re not speaking cars or beer here. What we are we are speaking of is people who vote for spoiler candidates due to a misguided fantasy it has some impact other than to help aid the election of people like Trump, as seen in this past election.

We have a two party system and we’re not going to have a parliamentary system (which I do like better) ever in either of our lifetimes. Voting for a third party candidate in a presidential election is voting or a spoiler candidate. That’s very simply how it works. Be you a Republican or a Democrat.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Great example. dalton99a Feb 2018 #1
The assumption being zipplewrath Feb 2018 #2
Bingo. shanny Feb 2018 #12
And what made those voters galvanize against Hillary? Think. bullimiami Feb 2018 #28
Anger zipplewrath Feb 2018 #40
Hard to admit the anger may have been stoked by manipulation. bullimiami Feb 2018 #41
Then again, who/what enticed Jill Stein to even run in the first place? mr_lebowski Feb 2018 #31
Well, we're both guilty zipplewrath Feb 2018 #39
I know progressive voters who believed lies about Hillary and voted for Stein or a write-in. yardwork Feb 2018 #36
The trend continues among swing states bearsfootball516 Feb 2018 #3
She'd look great in an orange jumpsuit BannonsLiver Feb 2018 #4
If we argue that there shouldn't be more than two candidates, we argue against democracy. Doodley Feb 2018 #5
Strawman. kcr Feb 2018 #6
I saw that, but I also saw some replies. Doodley Feb 2018 #25
Lord. NurseJackie Feb 2018 #7
Dear god, I dont want to have to read that stuff HERE.. not HERE Eliot Rosewater Feb 2018 #10
Moscow enid602 Feb 2018 #8
Yes, I agree. We need to have a wide selection of candidates that are not influenced by Doodley Feb 2018 #27
Yes I agree, of course. Doodley Feb 2018 #35
Some here do that a LOT. shanny Feb 2018 #14
The Russians encouraging people to vote third party to sway our election. herding cats Feb 2018 #19
Do you think America should be unique in the Western world in only having a choice of two? Doodley Feb 2018 #30
Thats all irrelevant to our current situation. herding cats Feb 2018 #32
Who is pretending things are other than they are? To me, Trump is an abomination. He is the most Doodley Feb 2018 #33
Let me refresh the post you responded to in your memory. herding cats Feb 2018 #37
Many, many candidates is a fine notion. Codeine Feb 2018 #29
I agree with that. Thank you. Doodley Feb 2018 #34
All on has to remember is this, Wellstone ruled Feb 2018 #9
Nuff indeed. shanny Feb 2018 #13
Was going to tell you about this thread. What about the Gabi Hayes Feb 2018 #21
21 states. Wellstone ruled Feb 2018 #22
Nothing about Jill Stein in the indictment FarCenter Feb 2018 #11
Jill Stein is mentioned in the indictment- page 18 wishstar Feb 2018 #16
OK, I missed that. Any other mentions? FarCenter Feb 2018 #18
Choose peace and vote for Jill Stein. Trust me, its not a wasted vote. Cha Feb 2018 #20
Yes there is. Search the document and you'll find it. George II Feb 2018 #17
Betsy helped. gibraltar72 Feb 2018 #15
K&R betsuni Feb 2018 #23
Put that together with AA votes suppressed mcar Feb 2018 #24
I still believe Michigan was stolen. Tatiana Feb 2018 #26
They threw out a huge number of 'spoiled' ballots in Detroit. Demsrule86 Feb 2018 #42
So what about all the people here at the time (prior to our DU hack) who Laura PourMeADrink Feb 2018 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jill Stein received 50,70...»Reply #37