General Discussion

Abnredleg

(1,260 posts)

9. Ammo is Protected

Sat Feb 17, 2018, 09:57 AM

Feb 2018

Having an operating weapon is a protect right, and not having access to bullets means it is no longer an operating weapon. The federal government cannot restrict piecemeal what the constitution forbids them wholesale. A First Amendment example would be the government allowing us free speech on DU but throttling the bandwidth so as to make the site unusable

See Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gun control through ammunition? [View all] rainy Feb 2018 OP

That should be part of a proper plan.... Sancho Feb 2018 #1

That is a well thought out reply. Like driving rainy Feb 2018 #3

+++++++++++ HAB911 Feb 2018 #13

chris rock lapfog_1 Feb 2018 #2

I saw that way back. Love it!!! rainy Feb 2018 #4

One of the best comedy bits ever. Dave Starsky Feb 2018 #7

Maybe. Ligyron Feb 2018 #5

I would add that every gun owner should have some specific liability insurance rurallib Feb 2018 #6

Your homeowners policy probably already covers firearm accidents Abnredleg Feb 2018 #10

I think that might work. Demsrule86 Feb 2018 #8

Ammo is Protected Abnredleg Feb 2018 #9

California: rainy Feb 2018 #11

I'm not arguing ammo can't be regulated Abnredleg Feb 2018 #14

I do understand that. Makes sense. rainy Feb 2018 #15

What is a basic hunting rifle? Are you suggesting a ban on specific calibers of ammunition? Marengo Feb 2018 #12