Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
19. You don't think that would happen?
Thu Jul 26, 2012, 11:58 AM
Jul 2012

If you can make 20 bucks per hour standing around in starbucks or 20 bucks per hour in a skilled or semi-skilled trade (say hauling concrete at a construction site) who is going to choose the harder job?

It would necessarily raise all wages.

And I wouldn't push for doing this overnight.

My ideal plan if I had my way (still about 10-15 years from a benevolent dictatorship headed by yours truly though) would be to gradually increase it up to 20 dollars per hour over a period of years and then permanently peg it to the inflation index.

Say a buck fifty per year for the next 8 years or so. And throw in there a slight reduction in the work week every other year (39 hours this year, 38 in 2014, 37 in 2016 and so on) and tie that to further increases to offset the lost hours (working 39 hours instead of 40 is a decrease by 2.5 percent of your weekly earnings, so increase wages an addition 2.5%).

Gradual changes would still bring about benefits for those at the very bottom without causing a massive economic upset at a time when things are fragile enough as is.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The only "skills mismatch" that appears to exist is that businesses want to hire employees that TwilightGardener Jul 2012 #1
Agreed with this Xyzse Jul 2012 #2
Bingo. Scuba Jul 2012 #9
Yes, that is the fantasy of every bad manager Mopar151 Jul 2012 #11
+1. Just a touch over 30 years ago, companies still had the attitude that they were hiring gkhouston Jul 2012 #21
Seems like the problem has an obvious solution Proud Liberal Dem Jul 2012 #3
When I hear "job training", I assume one is speaking of taking a high school grad and putting him TwilightGardener Jul 2012 #5
It's ad-speak.... Wounded Bear Jul 2012 #4
I've witnessed this, and don't know what the answer is... TreasonousBastard Jul 2012 #6
American employers aren't ready to pay Americans for their skills. hay rick Jul 2012 #7
I would like for use to raise the minimum wage while working on 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #8
How much would a head of lettuce cost if the pickers made $20 an hour, though? TwilightGardener Jul 2012 #10
Not much 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #12
Going from $4/day to $160/day is way more than a 40% increase. nt NickB79 Jul 2012 #13
I was exaggerating with the 4 bucks per day 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #14
See, now you're talking a few bucks more per hour, not zooming from $4 to $20. TwilightGardener Jul 2012 #15
I'm amazed at the opposition on this website to increasing the minimum wage 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #16
I'd love a minimum wage of $25 an hour, but then all wages would have had to increase TwilightGardener Jul 2012 #17
You don't think that would happen? 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #19
We need to start offering incentives for keeping Americans employed. Ganja Ninja Jul 2012 #18
A story conconcted to screw us. All workers organize, it's the only way to get any leverage.. limpyhobbler Jul 2012 #20
American workers Aerows Jul 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Big Jobs Myth: Americ...»Reply #19