Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: WE THE PEOPLE [View all]

hack89

(39,181 posts)
14. Losing arguments are still losing arguments
Mon Feb 19, 2018, 04:52 PM
Feb 2018

Looks like Obama, Hillary and Bernie knew what they were talking about.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WE THE PEOPLE [View all] njhoneybadger Feb 2018 OP
Which interpretation is dishonest? Marengo Feb 2018 #1
Yours and other gunners. You guys fail to acknowledge the first 13 words in the Amendment. Hoyt Feb 2018 #2
What was the original intent? Marengo Feb 2018 #3
Hilliary, Bernie and Obama agree with us, however. hack89 Feb 2018 #7
More gunner BS. Read Stevens' dissent in Heller. I get, when it comes to guns, you guys support Hoyt Feb 2018 #13
Losing arguments are still losing arguments hack89 Feb 2018 #14
We all know that Heller permits strict gun control. hack89 Feb 2018 #15
Supporting right wing Justices is still supporting right wing politicians and supporters. Hoyt Feb 2018 #18
Scalia supported strict gun control. hack89 Feb 2018 #19
I support limiting your "right" to carry lethal weapons, Yes. Hoyt Feb 2018 #20
Good luck with that. hack89 Feb 2018 #21
The argumentum ad verecundiam is a damned popular fallacy. LanternWaste Mar 2018 #27
So there are no legal scholars that support the militia interpretation? hack89 Mar 2018 #28
The "Individual Right" interpretation njhoneybadger Feb 2018 #4
Yet both Hilliary and Bernie say otherwise. hack89 Feb 2018 #5
Well, they had to say that or they they would have been accused of wanting to take away njhoneybadger Feb 2018 #8
It has been in the Democratic Party platform several times hack89 Feb 2018 #9
I don't think rewriting the 2nd Amendment is unreasonable. njhoneybadger Feb 2018 #10
Just unrealistic. Nt hack89 Feb 2018 #12
Maybe someday we will have 2/3 of congress njhoneybadger Feb 2018 #16
You need 3/4 of the states hack89 Feb 2018 #17
38 states is even more than 33 states. Captain Stern Feb 2018 #24
My bad. Nt hack89 Feb 2018 #25
Where and when has that been enforced, as on militia membership as a prerequisite for the... Marengo Feb 2018 #6
Most people are sick, tired and bored with the 2A debate leftstreet Feb 2018 #11
With the exception of limiting the number owned... GulfCoast66 Feb 2018 #22
Thank YOU! smirkymonkey Feb 2018 #23
Arguing the second amendment with gun fetishists is pointless. hunter Feb 2018 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WE THE PEOPLE»Reply #14