Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Need help countering my gun nut brother in law on the 2nd amendment [View all]Vinca
(54,192 posts)19. Suggest he seek psychiatric help. I bet he checks under his bed every night for foreigners.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Need help countering my gun nut brother in law on the 2nd amendment [View all]
johnpowdy
Feb 2018
OP
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,..."
aikoaiko
Feb 2018
#16
Yes it is. "State" by definition means an organized collective that is considered the leading
Blue_true
Feb 2018
#28
yes, an organized collective that is considered the leading entity, (e.g., not i.e., government).
aikoaiko
Feb 2018
#31
The scholarship on the issue suggests that free state in the 18th context meant a nation free...
Marengo
Feb 2018
#44
I wouldn't bother to argue because there's no way to persuade someone
The Velveteen Ocelot
Feb 2018
#6
Indeed, repeating lame talking points of gunners, again? And asking for a response seems like a
Fred Sanders
Feb 2018
#39
No government establishes a bill of rights so that its people can take down the government.
MaryMagdaline
Feb 2018
#12
Suggest he seek psychiatric help. I bet he checks under his bed every night for foreigners.
Vinca
Feb 2018
#19
It doesn't even say 'private gun ownership' it says 'keep and bear arms' ... 95% of 'arms' in 1780's
mr_lebowski
Feb 2018
#38
Don't respond/argue with him on this topic at all. Move on to something else or leave.
Lil Missy
Feb 2018
#26
Exactly. Anyone who thinks we couldn't have destroyed the Taliban or Al Qaeda or ISIS completely
mr_lebowski
Feb 2018
#41
The present gunowners would not be on the side of the people if the need arose to defend ourselves..
kentuck
Feb 2018
#46
It is certainly outdated. The supporters of the 2nd still believe its the 1800s or something
johnpowdy
Feb 2018
#53