Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Levi Sanders: Dana Loesch is right, Obama is weakest president on Russians, Trump taps into WWC pain [View all]George II
(67,782 posts)22. What makes you say that? Here's some information about that district:
"Politically, the 1st district is one of the most competitive congressional districts in the country, with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+2. The district has changed hands in five of the last six elections and has given no candidate more than 54% of the vote since 2004."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Hampshire%27s_1st_congressional_district
NO one has won the district "comfortably" in the last six elections. If he wins comfortably it would be because the voters perceived him as a republican.
It disgusts me that a political neophyte, running on name only, would challenge other Democrats for a seat that is currently occupied by a Democrat. This will only create more division in the district and may all but guarantee a republican victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Hampshire%27s_1st_congressional_district
NO one has won the district "comfortably" in the last six elections. If he wins comfortably it would be because the voters perceived him as a republican.
It disgusts me that a political neophyte, running on name only, would challenge other Democrats for a seat that is currently occupied by a Democrat. This will only create more division in the district and may all but guarantee a republican victory.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
210 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Levi Sanders: Dana Loesch is right, Obama is weakest president on Russians, Trump taps into WWC pain [View all]
KitSileya
Feb 2018
OP
Seems he doesn't think much of Barack Obama, either. But then again his father....
George II
Feb 2018
#37
That is because unity is NOT the agenda with the folks you are talking about, just the opposite
Eliot Rosewater
Feb 2018
#90
Whoa ho, Sanders' son is off to a great start (not). He's lost already with that crappola.
brush
Feb 2018
#26
Last name is part of the Legacy/Dynasty so many claimed to have issues with Clinton
BoneyardDem
Feb 2018
#41
I recall that many said that Hillary wouldn't even have a political career if not for her last name
ehrnst
Feb 2018
#205
Based on some of his tweets in the OP, looks like he'd attract more republicans than Democrats.
George II
Feb 2018
#32
He's a "Democrat"? Seems he likes trump more than he does Obama, Harris and other Democrats.
George II
Feb 2018
#12
Yeah, gotta hand it to the guy, he figured why not put a D after his name, might
Eliot Rosewater
Feb 2018
#93
I guess he doesn't understand that license plates are issued by the state. If they want....
George II
Feb 2018
#191
Yes, she was paid about $500K by Burlington College over a few years to conduct...
George II
Feb 2018
#33
Sander's son endorsed/retweeted the NRA Loesch, calling that crap a sophisticated message?
poboy2
Feb 2018
#16
I for one never,ever, supported Mr Bernie even though I was always shot down for even saying so....
Old Vet
Feb 2018
#21
Some are having a hard time admitting they were wrong to support these people, but I will
Eliot Rosewater
Feb 2018
#95
Joseph Goebbels used very "sophisticated messaging" to tap into the anger and frustration
njhoneybadger
Feb 2018
#29
Man, just what we needed...my question, are we supposed to support this guy here, even though
lunamagica
Feb 2018
#42
Then he should be fair game here. We don't need this. We don't need this at all. Not not now
lunamagica
Feb 2018
#46
Well, retweeting Donald Trump tweet bashing Democrats and immigrants sure tells us a lot.
George II
Feb 2018
#48
I posted actual screenshots of those tweets and added one, just so everyone sees who they came from.
George II
Feb 2018
#53
But Levi said those things (or retweeted them), didn't he? Did he have an epiphany?
George II
Feb 2018
#86
Hell, until the party AND sites that align with the party acknowledge the real truth
Eliot Rosewater
Feb 2018
#97
this kinda BULLSHIT TALK MAKES OUE FUTURE LOOK BLEAK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bluestarone
Feb 2018
#57
Yeah, Levi Sanders is talking bullshit that is only meant to divide the Democrats.
KitSileya
Feb 2018
#73
after hearing all this i have NO REASON to talk to him! He's not a DEMOCRAT!!!!!
bluestarone
Feb 2018
#200
Why yes. He wouldn't have dropped Bernie's name if there was no reason to question him.
Wwcd
Feb 2018
#59
Tad Devine worked with Manafort on the Presidential campaign of a Putin ally in the Ukraine.....
George II
Feb 2018
#89
Imagine what Mueller sees. The whole dirty bunch can sit in prison forever. Make my fking day.
Wwcd
Feb 2018
#106
Never thought about Sander's son. Bot wow the guy is a far right republican. He sounds like trump.
rockfordfile
Feb 2018
#78
Who can be pinpointed in this list for contributions to prevent another Sanders con job disaster?
NBachers
Feb 2018
#175
Heh heh heh. I love how the anti-purity police just became the purity police.
progressoid
Feb 2018
#170
Fine, intelligent, and coherent response. I would've told prohemorrhoid to blow it out their ass.
NBachers
Feb 2018
#176