Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Justice

(7,271 posts)
7. Its about seeking restraining order when you have reason to believe person a danger to self/others
Sun Mar 4, 2018, 02:06 PM
Mar 2018

Discussion around this has been sloppy on TV and vague.

Under Connecticut's law -

1. Police have to obtain a warrant from a judge before guns can be seized (showing of risk but not high bar of showing mentally ill. Must push back on state's that focus on requiring showing of mentally ill - that is how failures happened in FLA Parkland shooting.

2. Owner of the firearms is entitled to a hearing within two weeks to decide whether or not the guns will be returned.

Four other states have similar laws – California, Oregon, Washington and Indiana.

Duke University study found Connecticut’s law has likely prevented dozens of gun suicides.

fords.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/who-can-have-a-gun/extreme-risk-protection-orders/

There is due process but the idea is you take guns away based on warrant so there is immediacy, surprise. Don't signal to person will be taking them to court to take guns away.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Meghan McCain lying on AB...»Reply #7