Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dennis Donovan

(31,059 posts)
14. Does the shitgibbon know that NK STILL holds a commissioned US Navy ship hostage???
Thu Mar 8, 2018, 07:01 PM
Mar 2018
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Pueblo_(AGER-2)#Pueblo_incident



Pueblo incident
On 5 January 1968, Pueblo left U.S. Navy base Yokosuka, Japan, in transit to the U.S. naval base at Sasebo, Japan; from there she left on 11 January 1968, headed northward through the Tsushima Strait into the Sea of Japan. She left with specific orders to intercept and conduct surveillance of Soviet Navy activity in the Tsushima Strait and to gather signal and electronic intelligence from North Korea.[8] The declassified SIGAD for the National Security Agency (NSA) Direct Support Unit (DSU) from the Naval Security Group (NSG) on Pueblo during the patrol involved in the incident was USN-467Y.[9] AGER (Auxiliary General Environmental Research) denoted a joint Naval and National Security Agency (NSA) program.[10]

At 17:30 on 20 January 1968, a North Korean modified SO-1 class Soviet style submarine chaser passed within 4,000 yards (3.7 km) of Pueblo, which was about 15.4 nautical miles (28.5 km) southeast of Mayang-do at a position 39°47'N and 128°28.5'E.[11]

In the afternoon of 22 January 1968, the two North Korean fishing trawlers Rice Paddy 1 and Rice Paddy 2 passed within 30 yards (27 m) of Pueblo. That day, a North Korean unit made an assassination attempt in the "Blue House" executive mansion against the South Korean President Park Chung-hee, but the crew of Pueblo were not informed.[11]

According to the American account, the following day, 23 January, Pueblo was approached by a submarine chaser and her nationality was challenged; Pueblo responded by raising the U.S. flag. The North Korean vessel then ordered Pueblo to stand down or be fired upon. Pueblo attempted to maneuver away, but was considerably slower than the submarine chaser. Several warning shots were fired. Additionally, three torpedo boats appeared on the horizon and then joined in the chase and subsequent attack.[11]

The attackers were soon joined by two MiG-21 fighters. A fourth torpedo boat and a second submarine chaser appeared on the horizon a short time later. The ammunition on Pueblo was stored belowdecks, and her machine guns were wrapped in cold weather tarpaulins. The machine guns were unmanned, and no attempt was made to man them. An NSA report quotes the sailing order:

(...) Defensive armament (machine guns) should be stowed or covered in such manner so that it does not cause unusual interest by surveyed units. It should be used only in the event of a threat to survival (...)

and notes

In practice, it was discovered that, because of the temperamental adjustments of the firing mechanisms, the .50-caliber machine guns took at least ten minutes to activate. Only one crew member, with former army experience, had ever had any experience with such weapons, although members of the crew had received rudimentary instructions on the weapons immediately prior to the ship's deployment.[11]


Reported positions of USS Pueblo

North Korean chart showing where they say they captured USS Pueblo
U.S. Navy authorities and the crew of Pueblo insist that before the capture, Pueblo was miles outside North Korean territorial waters. North Korea says the vessel was well within North Korean territory. The mission statement allowed her to approach within a nautical mile (1,852 m) of that limit. North Korea, however, describes a 50-nautical-mile (93 km) sea boundary even though international standards were 12 nautical miles (22 km) at the time.[12]

The North Korean vessels attempted to board Pueblo, but she was maneuvered to prevent this for over two hours. A submarine chaser then opened fire with a 57 mm cannon, killing one member of the crew. The smaller vessels fired machine guns into Pueblo, which then signaled compliance and began destroying sensitive material. The volume of material on board was so great that it was impossible to destroy it all. An NSA report quotes Lieutenant Steve Harris, the officer in charge of Pueblo's Naval Security Group Command detachment:

(...) we had retained on board the obsolete publications and had all good intentions of getting rid of these things but had not done so at the time we had started the mission. I wanted to get the place organized eventually and we had excessive numbers of copies on board (...)

and concludes

Only a small percentage of the total classified material aboard the ship was destroyed.

Radio contact between Pueblo and the Naval Security Group in Kamiseya, Japan, had been ongoing during the incident. As a result, Seventh Fleet command was fully aware of Pueblo's situation. Air cover was promised but never arrived. The Fifth Air Force had no aircraft on strip alert, and estimated a two to three-hour delay in launching aircraft. USS Enterprise was located 510 nautical miles (940 km) south of Pueblo, yet her four F-4B aircraft on alert were not equipped for an air-to-surface engagement. Enterprise's captain estimated that 1.5 hours (90 minutes) were required to get the converted aircraft into the air.[11]

Pueblo followed the North Korean vessels as ordered, but then stopped immediately outside North Korean waters. She was again fired upon, and a sailor, fireman Duane Hodges, was killed. The ship was finally boarded at 05:55 UTC (2:55 pm local)[13] by men from a torpedo boat and a submarine chaser. Crew members had their hands tied and were blindfolded, beaten, and prodded with bayonets. Once Pueblo was in North Korean territorial waters, she was boarded again, this time by high-ranking North Korean officials.[citation needed]

The first official confirmation that the ship was in North Korean hands came five days later, 28 January 1968. Two days earlier a flight by a CIA A-12 Oxcart aircraft from the Project Black Shield squadron at Kadena, Okinawa flown by pilot Ronald Layton made three high altitude high speed flights over North Korea. When the aircraft's films were processed in the United States they showed Pueblo to be in the Wonsan harbor area surrounded by two North Korean vessels.[14]

There was dissent among government officials in the United States, regarding how to handle the situation. Congressman Mendel Rivers suggested that President Johnson issue an ultimatum for the return of Pueblo on penalty of nuclear attack, while Senator Gale McGee said the United States should wait for more information and not make "spasmodic response[s] to aggravating incidents".[15] According to Horace Busby, Special Assistant to President Johnson, the president's "reaction to the hostage taking was to work very hard here to keep down any demands for retaliation or any other attacks upon North Koreans", worried that rhetoric might result in the hostages being killed.[16]

Although American officials at the time assumed the seizure of Pueblo had been directed by the Soviet Union, it has emerged in recent years that North Korea acted alone and the incident actually harmed North Korea's relations with most of the Eastern Bloc.[17]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Where? htuttle Mar 2018 #1
Normalising a Russian-backed nuclear terrorist, what could go wrong! Exotica Mar 2018 #2
Please be more specific Nevernose Mar 2018 #17
Un is being partially supplied by Russia Exotica Mar 2018 #18
I dont think thats necessarily true but I have concerns. nolabear Mar 2018 #3
Do you have a link? smirkymonkey Mar 2018 #4
Edited to include link Loki Liesmith Mar 2018 #6
Thank you! smirkymonkey Mar 2018 #10
Its Jong-un. herding cats Mar 2018 #5
If you can figure out how to let titles include dashes Loki Liesmith Mar 2018 #8
Sorry if I sounded critical. herding cats Mar 2018 #28
The criticism was fine and well deserved Loki Liesmith Mar 2018 #31
As to the dash issue... I suspect it is on the sites side and there is no solution. herding cats Mar 2018 #32
It's a trap... HipChick Mar 2018 #7
Dennis Rodman can be his envoy. C_U_L8R Mar 2018 #9
While Trump is there, Kim will do a missile test and let Trump watch. SummerSnow Mar 2018 #11
... SummerSnow Mar 2018 #12
None of this is new. They were talking about this earlier this week. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 2018 #13
Just announcing a formal invite Loki Liesmith Mar 2018 #19
Does the shitgibbon know that NK STILL holds a commissioned US Navy ship hostage??? Dennis Donovan Mar 2018 #14
Excellent point! And yet another reason to send Navy man Jimmy Carter! Rhiannon12866 Mar 2018 #20
So very true! A nuclear engineer who grew peanuts... Dennis Donovan Mar 2018 #26
That's something people tend to forget about President Carter Rhiannon12866 Mar 2018 #27
**Breaking News** SummerSnow Mar 2018 #15
Trumpie can meet him on the Moon... greytdemocrat Mar 2018 #16
with Moonies Exotica Mar 2018 #21
Smart move cagefreesoylentgreen Mar 2018 #22
The media is going ga-ga over it but..... kstewart33 Mar 2018 #23
Kim wants a propaganda score. Loki Liesmith Mar 2018 #25
It's what he's wanted all along marybourg Mar 2018 #30
Kim Jong Un will invite Trump into his palace Mr. Ected Mar 2018 #24
Does tough guy Don realize Kim knocks people off on a regular basis? Vinca Mar 2018 #29
Putin's candidate has been activated superpatriotman Mar 2018 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump has been invited to...»Reply #14