General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are "Conservative Democrats" good or bad for the Democratic Party? [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I believe that many get bogged down in the strategies by where we achieve our goals being even more important than the goal itself, and that becomes dogma.
Voting for a specific caucus leader, the method by which we achieve universal health care coverage, and voting or not voting on specific amendments is not part of the party platform, and is therefore dogma.
If dogma is what constitutes whether a Dem is "conservative" or "liberal" then I don't think that a conservative Democrat is a bad thing.
Their efficacy in getting to those goals, and their legislative accomplishments is more important to me.
A "moderate" or even "conservative" politician who is effective in getting elected AND getting things done towards the Democratic platform goals will get my vote over the most vocal liberal, feminist and progressive of politicians who talks about goals but doesn't get things accomplished, or have a detailed plan to do so.
To them I would say, go be a full time activist. We can use talkative people there.