Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Could they have gotten their AR-15 had the 1994 assault weapons ban still been in effect? [View all]Abnredleg
(1,260 posts)6. AR-15s style weapons were never banned
And millions were sold during the existence of the AWB. Thats why it was allowed to die - everyone perceived it to be worthless.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Could they have gotten their AR-15 had the 1994 assault weapons ban still been in effect? [View all]
brewens
Mar 2018
OP
Guards are better than arming teachers. Might as well start banning these type weapons even if it
Hoyt
Mar 2018
#3
Agree. I think most gunners will turn them in if they lose rights to own any guns, including
Hoyt
Mar 2018
#24
No, it banned certain features. One could take a potentially banned item.. and make it not.
X_Digger
Mar 2018
#12
And gunners did that to circumvent intent of legislation. Need to make sure gunners
Hoyt
Mar 2018
#25
No they circumvented the intent of the law. Yes, many laws are interpreted on "intent."
Hoyt
Mar 2018
#36
No, they complied with the law. There's no 'sorta, kinda' in following the law.
X_Digger
Mar 2018
#59
Honestly, XDigger, with all the guns you have and the time you spend with them, I think
Hoyt
Mar 2018
#71
I'm rather sure that "circumventing the intent of the legislator writing the law"...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Mar 2018
#73
No, it banned certain features. One could take a potentially banned item.. and make it not.
X_Digger
Mar 2018
#61
So? I don't know about that particular rifle, but MOST AR-15 style weapons were banned --
pnwmom
Mar 2018
#41
Attaching statistical significance to a rare event with wide variation is not sound math.
X_Digger
Mar 2018
#60
That isn't true. There were fewer mass shootings during the ban than before or afterwards. n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2018
#64
Why did you post a graph, trending down, that ended three years before the law expired?
pnwmom
Mar 2018
#14
Because those who wanted them were able to acquire them? Add the numbers to the left v the right.
X_Digger
Mar 2018
#15
If the numbers have only gone up since the ban ended, that would suggest the ban helped. n/t
pnwmom
Mar 2018
#16
Did you get that magazine conveniently, just like buying a stock AR with one now?
brewens
Mar 2018
#29
They were always available at every gun show and online, but for higher prices.
aikoaiko
Mar 2018
#62
Who cares, for the greater good of society and the value of individual lives, ban all guns.
Canoe52
Mar 2018
#26
You mean banned like in Jamaica or Mexico where they have 4 to 10x's the homicides?
EX500rider
Mar 2018
#46
Under the assault weapon ban specific guns including the AR- 15 were banned... now
Demsrule86
Mar 2018
#45
If grenades were legal, the NRA would say well you could still kill with an AR15 instead
rickford66
Mar 2018
#68