Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Mayor Bloomberg pushing NYC hospitals to hide baby formula so more new moms will breast-feed [View all]Cairycat
(1,786 posts)70. Actually, it's possible for adoptive mothers to nurse
but whether or not that's their choice, you would think that if adoption is planned, arrangements to have formula on hand if needed, would be made. Formula is still available for babies who are not breastfed, for whatever reason. There is no limitation on formula, merely on its advertising.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
205 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Mayor Bloomberg pushing NYC hospitals to hide baby formula so more new moms will breast-feed [View all]
shadowrider
Jul 2012
OP
That is patently assinine. Not all women want to breast feed. I did not. My mom could not.
peacebird
Jul 2012
#3
Some women are taking/using substances and should not breast feed...does bloomberg include
Tikki
Jul 2012
#48
ummm... I am a woman, I believe we are smart enough to know what is right for us. I remember the
peacebird
Jul 2012
#66
"Doctor, this woman refuses to feed her infant, it will die without a medical request for formula"
peacebird
Jul 2012
#73
"document a *medical reason* for every bottle (of formula) that a newborn receives"
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#147
I very seriously doubt that. Most hospital pediatric departments i've been in have been promoting
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#148
well, it apparently is around here, because even our tiny country hospital has a lactation
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#151
This rule only applies to mothers who WANT to breastfeed and are trying to do so.
pnwmom
Aug 2012
#205
Anyone can market anything they want. It's the consumers choice whether or not to buy.
shadowrider
Jul 2012
#34
Fought 1%er like Bloomie all my life to give people options, its not libertarian in the least
ProgressiveProfessor
Jul 2012
#139
While I agree with you for obvious reasons, this removes, without a medical reason
shadowrider
Jul 2012
#10
The documentation is aimed specifically at the nurses, (and docs)who have a habit of pushing formula
vanlassie
Jul 2012
#83
or are the corporations doing everything they can do get moms to give up breastmilk - which is FREE
Coexist
Jul 2012
#22
I understand, but you made the decision, it wasn't made for you. That's my point n/t
shadowrider
Jul 2012
#24
they sent formula to a brand new mom... who may be struggling with breastfeeding
Coexist
Jul 2012
#25
the vulture like access was referring to formula companies having their products
Coexist
Jul 2012
#113
I never said Nestle was the good guy. Nor would my daughters who tried so hard.
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#120
To me, being inundated with free samples and "swag" that basically makes me a formula advertizement
antigone382
Jul 2012
#33
She wants the nanny state to feed her child. The formula cost goes on the insurance bill.
vanlassie
Jul 2012
#107
To me the nanny state would be the hospitals telling women to use formula
riverbendviewgal
Jul 2012
#131
No, it gives, for medically supported reasons, the BEST nutrition for the BABY.
cleanhippie
Jul 2012
#165
Pushing unnecessary drugs and antibiotics to avoid lawsuits is a much greater public health threat
4th law of robotics
Jul 2012
#193
Medicaid, Medical Assistance Program, Family Health Plus, NYC Public Hospitals.
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#146
medicaid is paid for by the feds and the *states* and managed by the *states*. poor people
HiPointDem
Jul 2012
#194
"manufactured baby food, as we know it today, was a byproduct of the European Industrial Revolution"
villager
Jul 2012
#17
No to the advertisement, but I'm worried about the parents not having something for backup.
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#18
Not every new mom has that advantage. There was a tragic story a few years ago where
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#21
Good. Unless a mother is incapable of breast feeding, that's the best way to raise a baby.
HopeHoops
Jul 2012
#31
sometimes, tho, women with the best of intentions, go thru a LOT of torment when the
CTyankee
Jul 2012
#86
I'd file that under "incapable" even though it doesn't mean she's not producing milk.
HopeHoops
Jul 2012
#154
This is not about which is better. This is about freedom of choice. nt
Comrade_McKenzie
Jul 2012
#42
right. that is what i said. really rollin eyes. this is rw argument and so fuckin
seabeyond
Jul 2012
#61
Maybe it depends upon which hospital, because the hospital where I gave birth to my three boys,
IndyJones
Jul 2012
#149
I always cast my vote for a Mayor who thinks he has a legal say in my baby feeding decidions. n/t
kickysnana
Jul 2012
#62
The choice to breastfeed or formula feed is up to the mother, not Mayor Bloomberg.
IndyJones
Jul 2012
#72
If an action has medical consequences, shouldn't there be a medical reason for the action?
Cairycat
Jul 2012
#74
I am well aware of the benefits and downfalls. It is not a government official's place to make it
IndyJones
Jul 2012
#85
Proving that this is a ridiculous attempt to interfere in something that is no one's decison
IndyJones
Jul 2012
#117
So the presumption is that mothers are too stupid to decide for themselves so the gummament
IndyJones
Jul 2012
#129
I don't think they are taking away anyone's rights. I appreciate the links of information
IndyJones
Jul 2012
#142
I don't think they should be handing out the free formula diaper bags, but OTOH I don't think
gollygee
Jul 2012
#88
Okay, he's losing it now. What's wrong with him???? He shouldn't be elected again.
Honeycombe8
Jul 2012
#110
"Document a medical reason for every bottle" is about medical personnel being ACCOUNTABLE
Cairycat
Jul 2012
#119
No, no, no. Your children are sickly, scrawny, less intelligent, full of allergies,
TwilightGardener
Jul 2012
#158
I wish some of these late posters would bother to peruse the rest of the thread.
randome
Jul 2012
#164
Breast v. bottle is not the issue here...the issue is that Bloomberg should not be
AzDar
Jul 2012
#166
Who should be responsible for putting checks on corporate advertising if not a public official?
randome
Jul 2012
#171
This is pure bloomberg nonesense. He is a power hungry ass. He dictated a similar thing with the
still_one
Jul 2012
#176
As far as I know no nurse or doctor tells a mom they must use formula. In fact they try to
still_one
Jul 2012
#196
I am generally skeptical of invocations of "nanny state" complaints . . .
markpkessinger
Jul 2012
#197
Is it just me, or does he seem overly interested in what people are drinking. n/t
hughee99
Jul 2012
#198