Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why would anyone argue that Chick-Fil-A should be immune to consequences for bigotry? [View all]Curtland1015
(4,404 posts)41. You aren't looking hard enough.
I've been arguing with people like this all day. Just read the comments in this very topic.
I've for all intents and purposes been talked down to and called a two faced hypocrite for thinking the idiot who owns Chick-Fil-A has the right to own and run a business.
I totally understand why people would be mad at this moron, but I'm shocked at how many people think the government should shut him down for it.
Eh... difference of opinion I guess.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why would anyone argue that Chick-Fil-A should be immune to consequences for bigotry? [View all]
gollygee
Jul 2012
OP
his "moral beliefs" aren't "it"- His using his business and its profits to publicly promote
Bluerthanblue
Jul 2012
#19
Yes, he is saying what he believes publicly and he is spending his money on that.
Curtland1015
Jul 2012
#23
that fast food joint IS keeping gay and lesbian citizens from getting married, by publicly stating
Bluerthanblue
Jul 2012
#35
You said it perfectly. I won't eat there, but the company should be able to open
IndyJones
Jul 2012
#57
I don't trust government which could very well be a right-wing government controlling the expression
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2012
#53
It is far more likely that a government will decide that it is un-American to oppose a war than for
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2012
#58
Are CEOs not considered public officials -at least when they are being interviewed in that capacity?
randome
Jul 2012
#80
Okay. But I could see defining CEOs as public figures as a check on corporate power and influence.
randome
Jul 2012
#83
They don't say one is required to eat it, they say it is wrong to boycott it.
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2012
#56
I was under the impression that the OP was suggesting that there were people here who are arguing
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2012
#48
I can't speak for the OP, and certainly wouldn't want to put words in anyone's mouth.
Curtland1015
Jul 2012
#51