Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Meltdown! Cohens' zeal to keep Trump off hook for a hush money payment essentially just voided NDA [View all]unblock
(56,211 posts)65. i mean, she already got it in 2016 and filed taxes in april 2017, right?
so at that time did she claim it to be a gift (or otherwise just not report it) and not pay taxes on it?
or did she claim it to be income and pay income taxes on it?
if she already paid income taxes on it and a court later determines it to be a gift i guess she could amend her return to get her taxes back.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Meltdown! Cohens' zeal to keep Trump off hook for a hush money payment essentially just voided NDA [View all]
kpete
Mar 2018
OP
And if there is no contract, then the $170,000 paid to Stormy Daniels is a gift.
no_hypocrisy
Mar 2018
#7
I know. Thats why I said I dont know if the principle extends to this situation
EffieBlack
Mar 2018
#45
She'd have to pay taxes on the income she made as a result of investing the gift.
pnwmom
Mar 2018
#64
She wouldn't have had to claim it as a gift or income. It would have been the job of the person
pnwmom
Mar 2018
#67
Yes and contract specifically says it is only enforceable if all parties sign it. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2018
#44
Then how does Trump or David Dennison or whateverthefuck his phoney name is...
Hassin Bin Sober
Mar 2018
#42
If so, then 45 can't go after her for damages, Only Cohen can. So, the big Q is, would Cohen?
lindysalsagal
Mar 2018
#55
Maybe Stormy didn't have a contract with 45*, but doesn't she have a contract with SOMEONE ????
groundloop
Mar 2018
#18
i agree that much of the legal action is actually about negotiating the value of the story
unblock
Mar 2018
#61
this is some great legal positioning here....this is mind blowing.. check this out
mentalslavery
Mar 2018
#23