Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
9. I agree.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 01:23 PM
Jan 2012

The whole 'end the war on drugs' shit he preaches is just that - shit that he is blowing out his ass. He has no plans, no power to 'end' it as POTUS. But sounds cool, maaaan.

And then there is his UN/NWO bullshit is just that. Bullshit. The UN has no way to affectthe 2nd Amendment or any portion of the US Constitution. He is a paranoid, xenophobic crazy-man. aPaulogists are like cult members.

Sure, he opposes military intervention in foreign wars, but not out of a sense of decency or pacifism; he would also withdraw from the UN (including humanitarian and peacekeeping operations, foreign aid would disappear, and if you think "unstable" regions are bad now, imagine what they would be like with the double-edged sword of multinational (read: US) corporate interests moving unchecked throughout the developing world AND an absence of monitored unilateral military involvement in those regions. Paul's position isn't one of altruism; it's one of isolationism. Not that I'm an advocate of First World military involvement in foreign problems, but look at what isolationism has netted in the past.

I don't know much about economics, but a return to the gold standard appears to me to be a likely trigger for severe deflation. Furthermore, while operating in gold might have worked 200 years ago, in a truly global economy, it doesn't.

He would remove social spending for almost everything, assuming the states would pick up the bill. First of all, where does he think the states will get the money for this? From the federal government, of course! So what's changed?

He claims to want to lower tuition, but what he wants to do is actually remove government control of tuition, and (wait for it) let the private sector deal with it. Do you actually believe that will result in lower education costs? Really?

None of us have time to cover point for point why Paul's selective and obsolete vision of a libertarian utopia won't work.

Let's just say it is the perpetual motion machine of political dogma; if it worked it would be really impressive and everyone would be happy, but it doesn't.

And, they have a paranoid nutter at the helm. Better luck next time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The powers in the GOP will not let this happen Ichingcarpenter Jan 2012 #1
Yes, thats perfect. A short window of glaring analysis. WingDinger Jan 2012 #6
Libertarians are a psychopathic, sociopathic fascisthunter Jan 2012 #2
how do you deal with getdown Jan 2012 #3
A lot of young folks go through a "cult" phase... reACTIONary Jan 2012 #18
good idea. getdown Jan 2012 #20
lol, he won't win the nomination. And that's just what his cultist followers want. PeaceNikki Jan 2012 #4
Yes, an attempt to apply National Enquirer black and white thinking to politics. For simpletons. WingDinger Jan 2012 #8
I agree. PeaceNikki Jan 2012 #9
The whole dumbass ball of wax is a smokescreen. The rich tell them, stop inflation, and taxes. WingDinger Jan 2012 #11
We can dissect the rhetoric of the GOP too and sufrommich Jan 2012 #5
The Libertarian Party INTENDS to use the husk of the rethug party as their organ. WingDinger Jan 2012 #7
Libertarians taking over the Republican party isn't the worst possible outcome Motown_Johnny Jan 2012 #10
So we can spend the entire election season with him railing against American foreign policy, the Puregonzo1188 Jan 2012 #12
I have personal experience in the war on drugs. We have 700+ foreign bases we cannot afford. Rage ov WingDinger Jan 2012 #13
The closest he gets to a debate with Obama will be if he takes a JoePhilly Jan 2012 #16
I wouldn't want to live in a Libertarian country JohnnyRingo Jan 2012 #14
libertarian is better than conservative SixthSense Jan 2012 #15
Libertarians, as a group, are nowhere near as benign, as Paul. There is the dodge of, INITIATING VIO WingDinger Jan 2012 #17
Just my opinion NNN0LHI Jan 2012 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I say make Ron Paul a fro...»Reply #9