Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

world wide wally

(21,836 posts)
17. There is no other reason to make this movie after so many years except to slam the Kennedy name
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 04:31 PM
Apr 2018

A Trump scandal movie would be bigger if it was just about money.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree, why bring up this forgotten story for over 50 years ago than disparage the Kennedy name? kimbutgar Apr 2018 #1
Thanks, I feel better someone agrees with me. TNNurse Apr 2018 #5
Conspiracy hadn't occurred tome, but I did think it was odd to make that movie... Honeycombe8 Apr 2018 #20
Honeycombe8, NOT kidding - raven mad Apr 2018 #84
Turns out it's produced by liberals. Seems to be just a money thing for them. Honeycombe8 Apr 2018 #90
I wasn't thinking so much about the actors, extras etc nor the director or producer. raven mad Apr 2018 #96
It's my understanding that that's what the exec producers are. The money guys. Honeycombe8 Apr 2018 #97
Tell your husband "reason" is the word, goal and action taken. Hortensis Apr 2018 #94
I dont think your necessarily a conspiracy theorist bearsfootball516 Apr 2018 #2
As Gibbs would say "Rule 39" LiberalFighter Apr 2018 #61
Dang! I keep confusing Rule 39 with Rule 34 :-D TheBlackAdder Apr 2018 #76
I thought the exact same thing when I saw the trailer last night. crazylikafox Apr 2018 #3
Depends on who made it. Did you look into that? nolabear Apr 2018 #4
I think there is also an element of "whataboutism," Tanuki Apr 2018 #6
That's precisely what this is jberryhill Apr 2018 #8
Exactly. My mother wants to go see it for EXACTLY this reason ToxMarz Apr 2018 #39
Plus it is yet another attack on all liberals. Tumbulu Apr 2018 #7
Might be the reason why. NCTraveler Apr 2018 #9
I have been wondering the same thing TNNurse...why now?? asiliveandbreathe Apr 2018 #10
I'm with other commenters on this one - it's bigger than that jberryhill Apr 2018 #11
Not only that, but Teddy's marriage to Joan was a tragedy in and of itself. Texin Apr 2018 #89
Yes. But the movie will soon be forgotten. Sophia4 Apr 2018 #12
This is my thoiught as well. phylny Apr 2018 #59
I am not a conspiracy theorist usually, but in this case I believe there patricia92243 Apr 2018 #13
Mark Ciardi, the producer is a Republican wishstar Apr 2018 #14
I think actor and diector's comments are interesting. Hoyt Apr 2018 #15
An unsupported hypothesis is not a conspiracy. It's simply speculation. LanternWaste Apr 2018 #16
Thank you, I laugh so little these days. TNNurse Apr 2018 #28
yeah that was good wasn't it... had a chuckle too. nt. druidity33 Apr 2018 #73
There is no other reason to make this movie after so many years except to slam the Kennedy name world wide wally Apr 2018 #17
K&R from Florida... BlueJac Apr 2018 #18
Great minds think alike mgardener Apr 2018 #19
Part of the never ending stream The Polack MSgt Apr 2018 #21
CNN (aka fake news) BigmanPigman Apr 2018 #22
I thought the same. mtngirl47 Apr 2018 #23
Reminds me of what I wrote years ago UpInArms Apr 2018 #86
U got it tiptonic Apr 2018 #24
I agree with you! BobTheSubgenius Apr 2018 #25
Wrong AZ Jim Apr 2018 #26
I hope they finally link Hillary to it... griloco Apr 2018 #27
With $$s from RW pockets such as the Mercers/Kochs - they don't even care if you watch it erronis Apr 2018 #29
saw a trailer this morning on morning joe lapfog_1 Apr 2018 #30
I agree with you it is a pre-emotive strike, and not coincidental. Enoki33 Apr 2018 #31
I don't think so. Looks like it's liberals who made & produced the movie. Honeycombe8 Apr 2018 #32
I agree with him. brooklynite Apr 2018 #33
If you do not think the scum in the GOP will use this against Joe Kennedy, I hope you are right. TNNurse Apr 2018 #35
If they try to , they won't need an obscure movie that few people will see to drive their narrative. brooklynite Apr 2018 #41
Seemed odd to me too. bullimiami Apr 2018 #34
I think that what was behind the "Swift Boating" story would make a more interesting movie dameatball Apr 2018 #36
Many people who think this is a conspiracy to cover for Trump former9thward Apr 2018 #37
I agree with you. mountain grammy Apr 2018 #38
So, the Churchill biopic was indented to make Theresa May and the Conservatives look good? brooklynite Apr 2018 #42
Just my opinion for what it's worth, probably nothing. mountain grammy Apr 2018 #82
Of course there exist conspiracies FromMissouri Apr 2018 #40
With all due respect that theory is crazy. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #45
I'm still waiting for someone to ask John Dean what he meant on the Watergate tapes when he said Boomerproud Apr 2018 #47
Nixon was obsessed with the Kennedys. That's well documented. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #48
of course FromMissouri Apr 2018 #63
I will defer to Benjamin Franklin DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #64
I'm not saying this guy has the whole conspiracy figured out. FromMissouri Apr 2018 #69
The Power Group stopped him from running in 1976 but didn't stop him in 1980 DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #70
the funny thing is, the movie probably takes your point of view FromMissouri Apr 2018 #67
What narrative ? What point of view. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #68
I don't know FromMissouri Apr 2018 #71
If the Power Group believed him to be all powerful why wouldn't they believe he could beat Carter? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #72
Makes perfect sense to me evilhime Apr 2018 #43
Yup. zentrum Apr 2018 #44
No real reason to make this...... ashredux Apr 2018 #46
They are certainly spending a fortune on advertising................ alittlelark Apr 2018 #50
U R Spot ON !!!! alittlelark Apr 2018 #49
Gotta agree with you here! bluestarone Apr 2018 #51
I am not sure if that was the intention, but I am certain the republicans will pounce smirkymonkey Apr 2018 #52
I said the same thing, and my husband thinks Im extreme. N/t woodsprite Apr 2018 #53
Joe is Joe. Ted is Ted. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #54
My immediate thought was, "Seriously?!" madamesilverspurs Apr 2018 #55
I think it's an attack on the Democratic Party and liberals in general. Nitram Apr 2018 #56
Its clearly an attempt to besmirch Democrats Kentonio Apr 2018 #57
I am a bona fide conspiracy theorist, and I believe that's far-fetched. Anon-C Apr 2018 #58
Absolutely wendyb-NC Apr 2018 #60
I am sharing some of your comments with him. I believe the responses are generally on my side. TNNurse Apr 2018 #62
I googled 'is director john curran a republican" Niagara Apr 2018 #65
i don't know barbtries Apr 2018 #66
No. You are not a conspiracy theorist WhiteTara Apr 2018 #74
I find the timing suspicious mcar Apr 2018 #75
My wife said the same thing. Lunabell Apr 2018 #77
There is a Kennedy in Congress. Blue_true Apr 2018 #81
I agree with you; disagree with your husband. dchill Apr 2018 #78
I agree with you. arthritisR_US Apr 2018 #79
Definitely a redumbliCON hit job on the Kennedy name. democratisphere Apr 2018 #80
Joe, III is going to kick butt - raven mad Apr 2018 #83
I don't think you're a conspiracy theorist at all peggysue2 Apr 2018 #85
A Pathetic Attempt at Both-Siderism dlk Apr 2018 #87
I'm in complete agreement with YOU! Texin Apr 2018 #88
That didn't cross my mind, but I did wonder if it wasn't an attempt to trash Democrats Vinca Apr 2018 #91
More like..... floWteiuQ Apr 2018 #92
Absolutely. mahina Apr 2018 #93
I cant think of any other reason to do it lunatica Apr 2018 #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My husband thinks I am a ...»Reply #17