Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flotsam

(3,268 posts)
47. Nobody really knows...
Sun Apr 8, 2018, 01:30 PM
Apr 2018

...here's a different scenario:
A BBC Inside Story episode, "Chappaquiddick," broadcast on the 25th anniversary of Kopechne's death, advanced a theory that Kennedy and Kopechne had left the party in Kennedy's car, but when Kennedy saw an off-duty policeman in his patrol car, he got out of the car, fearing the political consequences of being discovered by the police late at night with an attractive woman. According to the theory, Kennedy then returned to the party, and Kopechne, unfamiliar both with the large car and the local area, drove the wrong way and crashed off the bridge. The episode argued that the explanation would account for Kennedy's lack of concern the next morning, as he was unaware of the crash, and for the forensic evidence of the injuries to Kopechne being inconsistent with her sitting in the passenger seat.[61]

Writer Jack Olsen had earlier advanced a similar theory in his book The Bridge at Chappaquiddick, published early in 1970. Olsen's book was the first full-length examination of the case. Olsen wrote that Kopechne's shorter height (she was 5 ft 2 in (1.57 m), a foot (30 cm) shorter than Kennedy) could have accounted for her possibly not even seeing the bridge, as she drove Kennedy's car over unfamiliar roads, at night, with no external lighting, after she had consumed several alcoholic drinks at the party both had attended. Olsen wrote that Kopechne normally drove a smaller Volkswagen model car, which was much lighter and easier to handle than Kennedy's larger Oldsmobile.[27]

For a deeper dive:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chappaquiddick_incident

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I haven't seen the movie yet radical noodle Apr 2018 #1
This film is little more than a disgusting, cowardly hatchet job jcmaine72 Apr 2018 #2
Thats all the Rs want to talk about today. Hatchet job to diminish the failings of their own notdarkyet Apr 2018 #3
They had to reach back 49 years to find a scandel about a Democrat. SunSeeker Apr 2018 #4
Maybe a John Edwards movie next? oberliner Apr 2018 #10
No, none of his kids are a threat to the GOP. nt SunSeeker Apr 2018 #16
Which one of Ted Kennedy's kids are you referring to? MichMan Apr 2018 #17
Ted's great nephew is the one the film's backers are targeting. n/t pnwmom Apr 2018 #49
Read the thread. SunSeeker Apr 2018 #65
Someone should do a movie about Trump's grandfather csziggy Apr 2018 #28
How about a movie about yesterday's fire fatality? ucrdem Apr 2018 #35
I'll wait for the 8 part mini series on teenage Obama smoking tobacco and pot Bucky Apr 2018 #46
Oh come on now. One need not go back 49 years. I love Kennedy,but come on. Tipperary Apr 2018 #18
Coming up next: Why is Hillary hiding her secret connection to Chappaquiddick? struggle4progress Apr 2018 #53
Interesting how that came to your mind but not the filmmaker's. nt SunSeeker Apr 2018 #63
Thank you for posting this! ucrdem Apr 2018 #5
RW Propaganda. Just like that Dinesh one Cha Apr 2018 #6
Mary Jo's been dead nearly fifty years and Ted's been gone nearly ten struggle4progress Apr 2018 #7
It was a tragedy MichMary Apr 2018 #9
Post removed Post removed Apr 2018 #12
Probably MichMary Apr 2018 #13
... Hekate Apr 2018 #38
I think so, too janterry Apr 2018 #34
Kennedy went on to do great things over the course of MichMary Apr 2018 #45
... Hekate Apr 2018 #36
The diver wasn't qualified to make such an assessment. What did the autopsy say? yardwork Apr 2018 #19
There was no autopsy n/t MichMary Apr 2018 #20
Then it is irresponsible to speculate. yardwork Apr 2018 #21
Well, MichMary Apr 2018 #26
I don't know if you are, but you sound like a fox news viewer? rockfordfile Apr 2018 #29
thank you...for saying that Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #31
Really? MichMary Apr 2018 #37
Nobody really knows... flotsam Apr 2018 #47
That is plausible MichMary Apr 2018 #51
But they are marketing a movie with lots of made up material as factual. pnwmom Apr 2018 #52
Someone posted the other day MichMary Apr 2018 #54
He waited 10 hours to report it. I liked Kennedy, but the fact is he got away with something Tipperary Apr 2018 #23
Just to let you know MichMary Apr 2018 #39
I've filed it under "Things I really don't need to have an opinion about" struggle4progress Apr 2018 #41
I agree with Tribe, it's not about Ted, it's about his great nephew Joe OKNancy Apr 2018 #8
My thoughts exactly. Young Kennedys moving into politics Ilsa Apr 2018 #14
And DUers in this very thread are happy to join in. yardwork Apr 2018 #22
The moment I saw this mention of the movie I felt in my bones that this was alllll about Guilded Lilly Apr 2018 #42
nobody cares....box office is dismal spanone Apr 2018 #11
Mary jo kopechne grew up in my town ( Berkeley Heights NJ) Le Gaucher Apr 2018 #15
One thing about the R's... yallerdawg Apr 2018 #24
Haven't seen it, but read another perspective loyalsister Apr 2018 #25
Very much so. Good post. Tipperary Apr 2018 #40
Indeed he was loyalsister Apr 2018 #62
Is he saying ... left-of-center2012 Apr 2018 #27
Yes, he is saying that its purpose is to re-inject a dormant Benghazi into the ether ucrdem Apr 2018 #33
You packed a lot in that statement, ucrdem Hekate Apr 2018 #59
Thanks Hekate . . . ucrdem Apr 2018 #60
I saw the trailer, mentioned it here somewhere, knew immediately what this was Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #30
Who paid for this propaganda film? rockfordfile Apr 2018 #32
IMDB has 4 production companies. I'm not sure of their background underpants Apr 2018 #44
No way the timing is coincidental peggysue2 Apr 2018 #43
From the producers of "Teapot Dome Scandal"... Bucky Apr 2018 #48
Next up: The Chandra Levy Story ucrdem Apr 2018 #50
Maybe not advertising it would be a good option CountAllVotes Apr 2018 #55
It's disgusting to smear someone for a relative's deeds or misdeeds. Chemisse Apr 2018 #56
Yup. But it smacks of something broader than "a certain meteoric career". KPN Apr 2018 #57
It appears to have had a mediocre opening. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2018 #58
The story was tragic, scandalous, and there is no way to soft peddle it. However Senator Kennedy CentralMass Apr 2018 #61
Did a tragedy occur? Of course. This movie is still right-wing dirty tricks Tatiana Apr 2018 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The film "Chappaquiddick"...»Reply #47