Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 7 words that can stop any right wing talking point or conspiracy theory [View all]CousinIT
(12,800 posts)10. Why this works: Fake news sharing in US is a rightwing thing, says study
They've got no proof. They've got no facts. All they have is FAKE.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/06/sharing-fake-news-us-rightwing-study-trump-university-of-oxford
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/06/sharing-fake-news-us-rightwing-study-trump-university-of-oxford
. . .The study, from the universitys computational propaganda project, looked at the most significant sources of junk news shared in the three months leading up to Donald Trumps first State of the Union address this January, and tried to find out who was sharing them and why.
On Twitter, a network of Trump supporters consumes the largest volume of junk news, and junk news is the largest proportion of news links they share, the researchers concluded. On Facebook, the skew was even greater. There, extreme hard right pages distinct from Republican pages share more junk news than all the other audiences put together.
The research involved monitoring a core group of around 13,500 politically-active US Twitter users, and a separate group of 48,000 public Facebook pages, to find the external websites that they were sharing.
Users who shared similar collections of links were grouped together depending on what they were discussing: on Twitter, some identified cohorts included Conservative Media, Trump Supporters (a distinct group from Republican Party) and Resistance; on Facebook, those audience groups included Hard Conservative, Womens Rights and Military/Guns.
The findings speak to the level of polarisation common across the US political divide. The two main political parties, Democrats and Republicans, prefer different sources of political news, with limited overlap, the researchers write.
But there was a clear skew in who shared links from the 91 sites the researchers had manually coded as junk news (based on breaching at least three of five quality standards including professionalism, bias and credibility). The Trump Support group consumes the highest volume of junk news sources on Twitter, and spreads more junk news sources, than all the other groups put together. This pattern is repeated on Facebook, where the Hard Conservatives group consumed the highest proportion of junk news.
On Twitter, a network of Trump supporters consumes the largest volume of junk news, and junk news is the largest proportion of news links they share, the researchers concluded. On Facebook, the skew was even greater. There, extreme hard right pages distinct from Republican pages share more junk news than all the other audiences put together.
The research involved monitoring a core group of around 13,500 politically-active US Twitter users, and a separate group of 48,000 public Facebook pages, to find the external websites that they were sharing.
Users who shared similar collections of links were grouped together depending on what they were discussing: on Twitter, some identified cohorts included Conservative Media, Trump Supporters (a distinct group from Republican Party) and Resistance; on Facebook, those audience groups included Hard Conservative, Womens Rights and Military/Guns.
The findings speak to the level of polarisation common across the US political divide. The two main political parties, Democrats and Republicans, prefer different sources of political news, with limited overlap, the researchers write.
But there was a clear skew in who shared links from the 91 sites the researchers had manually coded as junk news (based on breaching at least three of five quality standards including professionalism, bias and credibility). The Trump Support group consumes the highest volume of junk news sources on Twitter, and spreads more junk news sources, than all the other groups put together. This pattern is repeated on Facebook, where the Hard Conservatives group consumed the highest proportion of junk news.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
7 words that can stop any right wing talking point or conspiracy theory [View all]
Initech
Apr 2018
OP
So true. They have a pretty low bar for what qualifies as "truth" or "fact." n/t
Beartracks
Apr 2018
#2
Unfortunately you are handing them the microphone and now have to wait for them to
grantcart
Apr 2018
#5
Agree,it is most useful with right wingers. But sometimes it is useful with others.
Hoyt
Apr 2018
#6
Just dont bother posting to Snopes, Politifact or any fact checking service
Tommy_Carcetti
Apr 2018
#13
That's my standard response to the religious as well. Reality and science are not their thing.
flibbitygiblets
Apr 2018
#27
show me proof from acknowledged LEGITIMATE, RELIABLE sources (inforwars, breitbart, fox,
niyad
Apr 2018
#33