General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie has been "tone policed" beyond anything I've ever seen. The irony is that to a large part of [View all]Tom Rinaldo
(23,199 posts)For example, if Bernie Sanders were pushing some privatization initiative, that would be something people might feel an obligation to fight him on. Or if he was pushing to relax elements of Dodd Frank for another example.Or seeking restrictions on Abortion, or cuts to child nutritional programs
Whether or not Sanders is effective is a debate I am willing to have after the midterms if it appears at that point that he may intend to run for President again. Because then we can debate between candidates on our side, which one is better for which reason or reasons. There are different ways to define effective, we can get into that later. Right now some are going out of their way it seems to find critical things to say about Bernie Sanders. Even if I were to 100% agree with you that Sanders is an ineffective legislator (ignoring other aspects of what might be accomplishing), do you find significant fault with his voting record then?
I bet you have no idea about the legislative record of the majority of members of the Democratic Caucus, nor should that matter to you if they do not represent you personally and they are not announced candidates for an office that you will get to vote on.
Meanwhile there are more posts on DU attacking Bernie Sanders than there are attacking Scott Pruitt, when the latter's future hangs in the balance. Bernie Sanders voted against Pruitt by the way. Does that upset you about him?