Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Obama's mom was not really "white" [View all]

New research has uncovered surprising findings about President Obamas ancestry.
Researchers at Ancestry.com have discovered that his lineage does include at least one black slave but not on his Kenyan fathers side. Obamas white mother is most likely a direct descendant of one of the first documented African slaves in the United States, said the team of genealogists.
Its team, while lacking definitive proof, said its research strongly suggests Obamas family tree on his mothers side stretches back nearly four centuries to a slave in colonial Virginia named John Punch.
In 1640, John Punch, an African, was a servant in Virginia who escaped, was caught and sentenced to remain enslaved to his master for life.
The Ancestry.com team said records suggested that Punch fathered children with a white woman, who passed her free status to those children, giving rise to a family of a slightly different surname, the Bunches. The researchers said over time, as the Bunches continued to marry, they became prominent landowners in colonial Virginia and were known as white.
Researchers at Ancestry.com have discovered that his lineage does include at least one black slave but not on his Kenyan fathers side. Obamas white mother is most likely a direct descendant of one of the first documented African slaves in the United States, said the team of genealogists.
Its team, while lacking definitive proof, said its research strongly suggests Obamas family tree on his mothers side stretches back nearly four centuries to a slave in colonial Virginia named John Punch.
In 1640, John Punch, an African, was a servant in Virginia who escaped, was caught and sentenced to remain enslaved to his master for life.
The Ancestry.com team said records suggested that Punch fathered children with a white woman, who passed her free status to those children, giving rise to a family of a slightly different surname, the Bunches. The researchers said over time, as the Bunches continued to marry, they became prominent landowners in colonial Virginia and were known as white.
http://thegrio.com/2012/07/30/obamas-mother-stanley-ann-dunham-a-descendant-of-a-black-slave/
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not anywhere, really. Race is a social construct. It has no biological meaning.
antigone382
Jul 2012
#8
Love that last point: there's more variation WITHIN a "racial" group than there is BETWEEN them.
patrice
Jul 2012
#38
And the genetic material that accounts for "race" is a minute fraction of a person's whole genome. n
patrice
Jul 2012
#44
In a very general sense you can, but intermarriage is not at all a new thing.
antigone382
Jul 2012
#64
Isn't this more important to the black community who see a difference between blacks who are
dkf
Jul 2012
#22
Stupid of Ancestry.com to research it and to publish it. Makes it look like they're
sinkingfeeling
Jul 2012
#16
It's a misfire because it implies that all Virginians are related to John Punch
CJCRANE
Jul 2012
#36
It's not impossible but the chances for this being correct are very very slim
struggle4progress
Jul 2012
#54