Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Goldman Sachs issues report: Curing diseases is a bad business-model. [View all]Xipe Totec
(44,590 posts)25. Not all problems can be solved by a free market
In fact, there are many cases where a good product can destroy it's own market.
That is why there is a certain class of problems that require government intervention for the good of the public. This is one of them. From the point of view of the people, the return on investment would be enormous; a little bit of tax expenditure to develop a cure for a disease, a little more to deliver the cure, and the problem goes away forever.
CDC should be in the business of developing permanent cures for diseases. In fact, it should be renamed CDE; The Center for Disease Eradication.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Goldman Sachs issues report: Curing diseases is a bad business-model. [View all]
DetlefK
Apr 2018
OP
Yes, provided they are chronic, debilitating, and a very expensive patented palliative is owned
FarCenter
Apr 2018
#13
International Telegraph Alphabet, also known as Baudot code . . . . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2018
#11