Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Goldman Sachs issues report: Curing diseases is a bad business-model. [View all]Volaris
(11,822 posts)49. Especially if out tax dollars are going to fund that research...
If you get tax money for medical research, anything you find, discover, cure, etc should belong to the Government for its first patent cycle (so it can be mass - produced for low cost storage and distrubition). I'd even be willing to pay an up - front fee for research hours/time on project, but yeah if we paid for that it belongs to ALL OF US, and we should give it away and Goldman Sucks can go get bent.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Goldman Sachs issues report: Curing diseases is a bad business-model. [View all]
DetlefK
Apr 2018
OP
Yes, provided they are chronic, debilitating, and a very expensive patented palliative is owned
FarCenter
Apr 2018
#13
International Telegraph Alphabet, also known as Baudot code . . . . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2018
#11