Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

matt819

(10,749 posts)
11. Basically
Mon Apr 16, 2018, 11:38 AM
Apr 2018

Their response is, trust us, he had lots of clients, and we're not going to tell you who they were.

Not a lawyer, but. . .

I wonder how much it would take to research his name in conjunction with legal actions - briefs filed, trials done, motions made, etc. - for the last 20 years (or more). Surely most of the last 20 years is digital.

Okay, don't release that info and risk contempt of court. Then when we find out and make it public - because much of it is likely to be public record anyway - it'll be that much more fun. And for documents that might not be public, there can be references to actions before they became unavailable.

Sure, it would be helpful to have all of the buffoon's aliases - John Miller, John Baron, David Dennison are most likely just a few of many.

I'm hoping the judge says, you violated my order, and you get nothing. Everything goes to the SDNY privilege team. Have a nice day.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The (non) client list tha...»Reply #11