HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » The (non) client list tha... » Reply #11

Response to Clarity2 (Original post)

Mon Apr 16, 2018, 10:38 AM

11. Basically

Their response is, trust us, he had lots of clients, and we're not going to tell you who they were.

Not a lawyer, but. . .

I wonder how much it would take to research his name in conjunction with legal actions - briefs filed, trials done, motions made, etc. - for the last 20 years (or more). Surely most of the last 20 years is digital.

Okay, don't release that info and risk contempt of court. Then when we find out and make it public - because much of it is likely to be public record anyway - it'll be that much more fun. And for documents that might not be public, there can be references to actions before they became unavailable.

Sure, it would be helpful to have all of the buffoon's aliases - John Miller, John Baron, David Dennison are most likely just a few of many.

I'm hoping the judge says, you violated my order, and you get nothing. Everything goes to the SDNY privilege team. Have a nice day.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 15 replies Author Time Post
Clarity2 Apr 2018 OP
democratisphere Apr 2018 #1
Clarity2 Apr 2018 #4
malaise Apr 2018 #2
Clarity2 Apr 2018 #8
NCTraveler Apr 2018 #3
Clarity2 Apr 2018 #6
NCTraveler Apr 2018 #10
Clarity2 Apr 2018 #12
pnwmom Apr 2018 #14
NCTraveler Apr 2018 #15
Renew Deal Apr 2018 #5
Clarity2 Apr 2018 #7
Shrike47 Apr 2018 #9
LineNew Reply Basically
matt819 Apr 2018 #11
Clarity2 Apr 2018 #13
Please login to view edit histories.