General Discussion

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)

20. Greenwald has attacked "Lefty posters"? Excuse my skepticism. Do you have a link for such attacks?

Mon Jan 2, 2012, 03:28 PM

Jan 2012

What I've seen is that some have attacked Greenwald and some have not

I have also seen that those who have attacked Greenwald have been upset with those of us who have not.

In addition, I've seen the use of ad hominem attacks against both Greenwald and against those of us who have not joined in attacking Greenwald.

If Greenwald is so important and so wrong, why aren't those who are attacking him engaging in discussions on the merits.

Now you say that he has attacked "Lefty posters." Is this true? I don't know whether it is or not. But if this is true, and if such so-called attacks on "Lefty posters" exist and are important for some reason, why not (1) provide a link or two to such attacks and (2) why such so-called attacks, if any, are important.

Why is it necessary to destroy his reputation? What purpose does it serve?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The echoing futility of attacking Greenwald with shallow discourse [View all] quinnox Jan 2012 OP

And ditto for ... frazzled Jan 2012 #1

good for you then quinnox Jan 2012 #4

Greenwald regularlly soiled diapers when he was an infant. Wilms Jan 2012 #2

lol quinnox Jan 2012 #7

I've seen plenty of intelligent rebuttals to Greenwald. Here's the thing though FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #3

What does any of that have to do with it? MNBrewer Jan 2012 #5

I'm responding to the OP, not a specific Greenwald article. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #8

No one is perfect. Yeah. That's it. Wilms Jan 2012 #6

Yeah, that IS it. Being 'perfection' is in the eye of the beholder. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #10

And which one of those groups pressed him on indefinite detention? Wilms Jan 2012 #11

Congress and senate who have the votes to override a veto. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #12

So? Wilms Jan 2012 #13

You DO KNOW that the bill WASN'T just about that one section, right? There's actually alot of good FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #14

I used to believe that "Big Tent" stuff, too. Wilms Jan 2012 #15

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions I guess. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #16

not on civil liberties getdown Jan 2012 #18

I believe they are looking for a repeal of certain provisions. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #23

I'd find that refreshing. Wilms Jan 2012 #24

yeah getdown Jan 2012 #25

And supporters of murder of Pakistani children... a country we are not at war with. Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #17

Who supports murdering Pakistani children? Or a racist drug war? FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #19

When you vote for most Democrats, you are also Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #27

SO your solution is to vote republican? Or just not vote at all? FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #29

I never said that. That's kind of like the "you're with us or with the terrorist" Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #30

But I expect everyone to know this info. We don't need some journalist to make up our own minds. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #34

Our President for one thing. And nearly all of our elected officials of either party. Puregonzo1188 Jan 2012 #28

Greenwald has attacked "Lefty posters"? Excuse my skepticism. Do you have a link for such attacks? AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #20

I have NO POWER whatsoever to destroy Greenwald's reputation, nor do I have interest in doing so. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #22

That's not responsive and does not support your claim that Greenwald attacked "Lefty posters". AnotherMcIntosh Jan 2012 #36

Several of the people in that painting owned slaves. Odin2005 Jan 2012 #21

Well, in that case... Wilms Jan 2012 #26

Ineffective against what? treestar Jan 2012 #9

I just got a call from an old friend who has been a lifelong Democrat and spends about 25% of his grantcart Jan 2012 #31

It's a piece of lint gazing at its own navel, inside of a navel being gazed at. MilesColtrane Jan 2012 #32

heh, thanks for that report quinnox Jan 2012 #33

Is the criticism of Greenwald hitting too close to home for you? MjolnirTime Jan 2012 #35