Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hassin Bin Sober

(27,462 posts)
67. In one of my Starbucks (near me but not one I frequent) they removed the seating to ....
Mon Apr 16, 2018, 11:00 PM
Apr 2018

.... avoid the issue of asking people to leave.


Here is a yelp discussion.

https://www.yelp.com/biz/starbucks-chicago-170


This review about sums it up:

Was really looking forward to the redux until I find they gutted it to remove seating. I have more problem with Lincoln Park trixies than I'll ever have problem with a homeless person catching some warmth. Way to go Douchebucks, way to go.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What in the hell are you talking about? angstlessk Apr 2018 #1
She's talking about a VERY VALID point Stinky The Clown Apr 2018 #17
NOT a valid point, one is a felony, but sitting in a booth is not! angstlessk Apr 2018 #18
I would say dont waste your breath but I do it aLL The time Eliot Rosewater Apr 2018 #26
Absolutely...since when can one person send someone to jail when multiple people say Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #53
My husband and I were just talking about that iwillalwayswonderwhy Apr 2018 #2
Why was a white woman allowed to stay there, and not buy anything HipChick Apr 2018 #3
Because of ignorance and racism, of course iwillalwayswonderwhy Apr 2018 #11
If only for P.R. sake... lame54 Apr 2018 #14
UNCUFF? Why cuff them in the first place? angstlessk Apr 2018 #19
I agree, they should never have been cuffed iwillalwayswonderwhy Apr 2018 #34
It's not a police issue PERIOD MountCleaners Apr 2018 #22
Do we know what conversation occurred between the cops and the victims? Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #4
Did the police confirm that they were indeed trespassing? EffieBlack Apr 2018 #7
In my experience, you get two warnings. One from the owner and then an ultimatum from the police. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #16
In my Starbucks no one pays attention MountCleaners Apr 2018 #24
In one of my Starbucks (near me but not one I frequent) they removed the seating to .... Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #67
In my experience you don't get past the 911 operator. hunter Apr 2018 #38
Some establishments have a silent alarm crazycatlady Apr 2018 #50
I dont know what town of state you live in but a call here to non emergency ends up at 911 Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #66
I have to say, I am so sick of kissing Cops asses so as not to get tickets or what have you. I am a Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #55
Trespassing Corgigal Apr 2018 #5
I agree up to a point EffieBlack Apr 2018 #8
I read Corgigal Apr 2018 #9
They told the cops what they were doing there - waiting for a friend EffieBlack Apr 2018 #10
Depends on what the store owner wanted. Corgigal Apr 2018 #12
The police don't have to do what the store owner wants if they think no law was broken EffieBlack Apr 2018 #13
I don't know the laws Corgigal Apr 2018 #15
Once the cops are there the reasons are irrelevant and more suitable for civil courts Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #20
This is wrong EffieBlack Apr 2018 #21
It's not wrong, Corgigal Apr 2018 #37
What was the safety risk? EffieBlack Apr 2018 #39
No idea Corgigal Apr 2018 #41
It is wrong because thats not how it works EffieBlack Apr 2018 #76
What? Thats exactly what they do. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #69
Theyre required to respond, but they are not required to arrest anyone just because a store manager EffieBlack Apr 2018 #72
A person is trespassing any time the owner or responsible party tells them to leave and they refuse. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #74
In a private residence. Not in a public facility. EffieBlack Apr 2018 #78
Starbucks stores are private property. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #82
Not confused at all EffieBlack Apr 2018 #84
Ah no, Corgigal Apr 2018 #32
Ah yeah, thats exactly how it works. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #68
Im curious why the manager felt the need to call the police on these men EffieBlack Apr 2018 #73
Those are good questions. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #75
This is a chain of blame - the manager and cops are complicit with each other EffieBlack Apr 2018 #77
I once had police show up because I was waiting in a grocery store MountCleaners Apr 2018 #25
"police asked the men to leave three times but they refused" PoliticAverse Apr 2018 #79
Because the police chief, relying on what his officers told him, is an unimpeachable source EffieBlack Apr 2018 #80
Are witnesses claiming that police never asked the men to leave? n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2018 #81
And there you have it: Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #86
Arresting people is not their only duty EffieBlack Apr 2018 #87
Starbucks is a franchise...there is a manager...and people hang out buying little or nothing Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #57
"but they were released quickly" BumRushDaShow Apr 2018 #33
+1 dalton99a Apr 2018 #36
Disgraceful and shows the cops are racist too. Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #58
Your curious why they thought it rose to that level? HopeAgain Apr 2018 #27
Effie, normally, you're on point. Blue_true Apr 2018 #6
You surely don't mean to compare rape to loitering leftstreet Apr 2018 #23
you're reading it wrong. that's not how analogies work. unblock Apr 2018 #28
The police were obligated to assess the situation, if the two men OWNED the resteraunt everyone woul uponit7771 Apr 2018 #29
The may own it soon EffieBlack Apr 2018 #40
IKR ... Looks like the manager had a complaint of racism in the past if reporting in the other uponit7771 Apr 2018 #43
Yet, DUers jumped in to defend her EffieBlack Apr 2018 #56
Why am I not surprised. Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #59
This message was self-deleted by its author RhodeIslandOne Apr 2018 #30
This post is stupid. KWR65 Apr 2018 #31
Beyond melman Apr 2018 #45
No it is not. Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #60
Does anyone know how long had they been waiting in the Starbucks. jalan48 Apr 2018 #35
This is not equivalent to the Starbucks arrest matter. Ms. Toad Apr 2018 #42
You missed a critical pount EffieBlack Apr 2018 #44
I addressed it. Ms. Toad Apr 2018 #46
law and justice are two different things radius777 Apr 2018 #71
You're not reading very carefully. Ms. Toad Apr 2018 #83
They dont grant a license but they provide evidence of whether there actually is such a policy EffieBlack Apr 2018 #85
If you are asked to leave and you don't leave melman Apr 2018 #48
Apparently, they weren't asked to leave until the police arrived EffieBlack Apr 2018 #52
Really but what does it mean when only Black folks are asked to leave? Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #61
It means you have a valid civil case fescuerescue Apr 2018 #89
The cops behaved badly as they always seem to do with POC..any white person would have been Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #90
Not if you own the place uponit7771 Apr 2018 #63
Huh? Big difference in severity of scenarios blake2012 Apr 2018 #47
No, I get it. Customers told the police that the two men had done nothing...so why handcuff Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #51
I agree the situation was as racist as shit and this kind of stuff happens all the damn blake2012 Apr 2018 #54
I am outraged at this sort of racism...it is persistent and hard to fight. My daughter is Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #62
Why, that would depend if the subject was a person of color or white of course. Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #49
White DUer kicked out of Starbucks jberryhill Apr 2018 #64
Well, that settled it EffieBlack Apr 2018 #65
Many ways to see it. Blue_true Apr 2018 #70
Rape and Trespassing are very different ExciteBike66 Apr 2018 #88
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Starbucks manager call...»Reply #67