Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)

13. I think you're on the right track, or more accurately

Reply to HoosierDebbie (Reply #2)

Tue Apr 17, 2018, 08:54 AM

Apr 2018

some ex- federal prosecutors on O'Donnell last night think so. They both thought it very likely that this is an attempt to get some document obtained by search warrant from Cohen suppressed under attorney-client privilege.

Desperation time.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So why did Cohen's folks state clearly in court that Hannity was their third client [View all] malaise Apr 2018 OP

They wanted it to seem like he actually had clients and was not just a "fixer" OKNancy Apr 2018 #1

How did they make it look more legitimate? malaise Apr 2018 #3

Exactly. Cohen would have done much better to name Hillary. Hortensis Apr 2018 #10

I'm wondering... HoosierDebbie Apr 2018 #2

Something is really wrong here malaise Apr 2018 #5

I think you're on the right track, or more accurately Hortensis Apr 2018 #13

Because there is proof DUgosh Apr 2018 #4

That's my thinking n/t malaise Apr 2018 #6

To invoke edhopper Apr 2018 #7

To quote Myron Cohen, "Well, -----if you're gonna throw LOGIC at me!" nt Atticus Apr 2018 #8

LOL malaise Apr 2018 #9

Hi malaise syringis Apr 2018 #11

It makes no sense malaise Apr 2018 #12

This is pure speculation, but since THEY see no problem with uncorroborated accusations, Atticus Apr 2018 #14