Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
12. And what's to stop us from raising taxes on the wealthiest? Aside from political will, that is.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:02 AM
Jul 2012

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1955: 51.2%. 2007: 16.6%. [View all] KansDem Jul 2012 OP
outrageous riverwalker Jul 2012 #1
"They didn't have a diagnosis of PTSD back then,... KansDem Jul 2012 #4
They knew about PTSD but they created different names for it. I believe they thought Uncle Joe Jul 2012 #21
Well, they did have abundant deaniac21 Jul 2012 #2
The US federal budget for 1955 was the equivalent of $68.4 billion in 2010 dollars slackmaster Jul 2012 #3
It's taken over a decade of tax cuts to build the deficit to its current level. Doremus Jul 2012 #5
Yes, tax cuts have to be offset with spending cuts, or they bust the budget slackmaster Jul 2012 #6
You forgot the sarcasm thingy.... Scuba Jul 2012 #7
You generate more revenue when you can. When you can't, you cut expenses. slackmaster Jul 2012 #11
And what's to stop us from raising taxes on the wealthiest? Aside from political will, that is. Scuba Jul 2012 #12
There's no reason not to, but no matter how much it won't be enough to fix the long-term problem slackmaster Jul 2012 #13
Sure they can... Scuba Jul 2012 #14
OK, so you break open the piggy bank and take every penny held by the top 400 slackmaster Jul 2012 #15
Why would you stop at 400? Why not tax the top 10%... and tax them and tax them.... Scuba Jul 2012 #17
Taxing the rich is fine. I'm all for it. The problem is if the spending problem isn't addressed, slackmaster Jul 2012 #19
They already decided that, hence I pay a higher percentage of my income in taxes than Rmoney. Scuba Jul 2012 #22
I agree with you on the priorities. We've pissed away TRILLIONS on counter-productive wars. slackmaster Jul 2012 #24
that is it we got to stop spending all this money on war ThomThom Aug 2012 #30
$10 million each? HiPointDem Jul 2012 #9
I meant 400 families paying $4.3 billion annually per family slackmaster Jul 2012 #10
it's not ALL about the Fab 400 hfojvt Jul 2012 #16
Once we've pushed everyone down to the present median income, there will be only one thing left... slackmaster Jul 2012 #20
well invading Canada is always a good thing hfojvt Jul 2012 #23
$109,400 isn't a whole lot more than I make, and I'm far from rich slackmaster Jul 2012 #25
no, it seems like a primary goal hfojvt Aug 2012 #26
I live in an expensive area, and am still recovering from a divorce that wiped me out slackmaster Aug 2012 #27
such a low income hfojvt Aug 2012 #28
A living wage in Kansas, but you couldn't come anywhere near buying a house in San Diego on that slackmaster Aug 2012 #29
"you might think that it's hopless, beyond our control hfojvt Aug 2012 #31
oh boy, it's the Rightwing myth of runaway spending hfojvt Jul 2012 #18
kr & fuck them all HiPointDem Jul 2012 #8
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»1955: 51.2%. 2007: 16.6%...»Reply #12