Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Duckworth proposes rule allowing babies on Senate floor [View all]Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)317. Right here:
Women are in the workplace, and men need to grow the fuck up.
This implies that the presence of women in the workplace is reasonably entailed by the presence of infants.
I apologize if that's not what you meant, but that is how it came across.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
339 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think a lot of accomodations need to occur for nursing mothers in the workplace but I just don't
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#1
that's the point... They hardly get anything done right now. Seriously, though... NO
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#3
I just keep thinking during the run up to Iraq how Robert Byrd might have appreciated the company
thewhollytoast
Apr 2018
#25
No... There are places children do not belong and that includes the "ADULT children" that the RW
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#6
I've been in board meetings with a nursing mother, and it was a small conference room.
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#10
and how do you think that meeting would have progressed if the infant had cried all the way through.
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#12
Oh, really? Give it a break. My premise from the first was accomodation. But others deserve same.
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#29
Your premise is faulty because we are stating an ALTERNATIVE accomodation should be demanded
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#93
Too late. She's due THIS MONTH. They're not somehow going to be able to create space
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#101
Bullshit. A room nearby can temporarily be repurposed. She wants a rule change--that should be
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#105
What is best for the child is being in her mother's arms. The Senate would do just fine.
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#108
If she wants (and surely SHOULD) be able to continue as a Senator, she is going to need help
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#112
Your "concern" is noted, but your "concern" indicates that Duckworth doesn't know what
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#144
LOL. Yes, she did! I knew the due date was in April but I'd missed the happy event!
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#289
Then it should not be the huge problem that many on this thread seem to think it will be
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#206
It's against Senate rules to have a baby in there as well. The Senate Parliamentarian
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#226
sounds like male designed rules to keep the silly womenfolk out of the workplace/off the floor
BoneyardDem
Apr 2018
#329
Ever notice that when one can't see the logic in comments of some it's a "strawman"?
George II
Apr 2018
#168
You haven't kept up with the issue. Tammy Duckworth has been talking about the problem
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#111
Bullshit. I have repeaatedly posted and your need to go back to all previous posts to make a point
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#115
Where did you discuss the fact that no accommodation was made for Kristin Gillibrand?
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#117
aww, another strawman. Anything else you want to introduce into the discussion. Forget it
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#121
It's not a straw man. It's directly relevant. She tried and failed to get accomodation.
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#127
Indeed. I think they had the same reaction when women wanted a decent restroom nearby. (nt)
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#179
Yes, and that will prohibit any nursing mother from being able to do her job.(nt)
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#37
Everyone here has advocated accommodation. so your posts are becoming incresibly disingenuous
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#52
The Senate hasn't offered any accommodation of any sort, other than the bathroom. n/t
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#88
and we are saying that should be demanded. Just as women's bathrooms had to be constructed.
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#91
She is wanting an accomodation rule passed now. So she should demand the RIGHT accomodation..
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#103
She is. And you're saying that she's a bad mother for wanting to bring an infant on the Senate floor
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#126
Your claiming I said something I NEVER said, Don't believe (that she is a bad mother)
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#130
I know - the slippery slope arguments going on here are amazing. And apparently the Senate floor is
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#102
Maybe that's the fear. It will spread like a horrible virus. If babies can be nursed in the SENATE
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#283
Who talked about nursing??? She wants to bring the baby inside, nursing or not.
DetlefK
Apr 2018
#27
"nursing is ridiculous as well." Well, 100 Senators disagree with you, even the non-progressives
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#330
I care about the child's welfare. They deserve better than a chaotic Senate floor
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#82
I'm saying she is demanding the WRONG accommodation. There needs to be a PERMANENT
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#99
Strawman again. and you don't know a damned thing about my childbearing history
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#24
I do not post my private details. And no, I don't owe you that information at all.
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#39
No one who has ever successfully nursed a baby would have the objections you have.
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#43
No one who is rational would argue against the infant being PROTECTED, ACCOMDATED in such a way
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#45
Any baby who has been in a house with a TV and older siblings has been through worse.
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#50
I care about the infants wellfare and believe they will do fine just off the Senate floor protected
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#53
Off the Senate floor they will also be exposed to the frightful dangers of electric lighting,
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#57
I SAID in a nursing/infant room off the Senate Floor so that the Mother can vote and quickly return
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#59
Your comments on nursing infants indicate a gap in your knowledge in that area. (nt)
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#66
No, it indicates a disingenous effort on your part to boister arguments. Despicable tactic that is
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#84
Again, that isn't going to work. You don't know a GD thing about me or anyone else and
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#55
You don't know a thing about me or anyone else. Your self-proclaimed "expertise" is no more
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#69
I know what you have posted here. And it indicates a lack of understanding of nursing babies. (nt)
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#96
I agree. The workplace should be more family friendly and mothers should be given opportunities
smirkymonkey
Apr 2018
#7
they don't sleep in a noisy, brightly lit, camera filled, disruptive room. They cry.
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#15
Duckworth has made it the issue. She's written op-eds about nursing in the Senate. n/t
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#58
I SAID in a nursing/infant room off the Senate Floor so that the Mother can vote and quickly return
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#63
There is no such place. They're saying she should do it in the germy, smelly, bathroom. nt
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#73
Every single day, infants happily nurse in all sorts of locations -- like shopping malls,
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#94
Yes, despite your typo, I DO indeed think she is capable of caring for her infant
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#118
The OP says nothing about nursing, just allowing babies in the Senate chambers Your strawman.
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#34
Duckworth has written about it. And speaking of dangerous (and disgusting) places, the option
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#62
You dont' know a GD thing about me or anyone else here. Your opinions matter no more than mine
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#46
No - you don't trust Tammy Duckworth's opinion if the Senate floor is "safe" for her child
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#129
I disagree with her specific accommodation, not that she should demand accommodation.
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#131
The child is giving up rights to a protective environment. A nearby repurposed office
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#109
Where is this idea coming from? Do you not understand that nursing mothers routinely
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#124
DO YOU not understand what is best for both mother and infant, now and future? Apparently not
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#128
DO YOU know better than Tammy Duckworth about how safe the Senate floor is for her infant?
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#132
Oh, you think that they're going to be just fine with pumping on the Senate floor?
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#224
Then the mother can hand the baby over to a babysitter to take it out. But a nipple
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#83
Fine.. I applaud you for not trying to inflate your own opinion by claiming I or others have no
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#77
I have nursed at the mall and only once was I asked to leave. I always was very discreet. I refused
Demsrule86
Apr 2018
#95
I don't think it should be allowed, since it would interfere with the function of the Senate...
Honeycombe8
Apr 2018
#147
I've been in board meetings with a nursing mother, and it was a small conference room.
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#148
Oh, I forgot that babies don't cry. My memories of being in theaters & church w/crying babies must
Honeycombe8
Apr 2018
#280
Inasmuch as the Senate has existed for about 240 years (100 members for the last 58 years)....
George II
Apr 2018
#188
Babies are in many workplaces. They don't belong on factory floors or dangerous places.
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#33
THAT was the accomodation I recommended. NO. they do not belong on factory floors or dangerous
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#38
The Senate floor is not full of bright lights, loud noises, and disruption. 95% of the time,
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#41
Offices Yes. But not places where they inconvenient people trying to do their jobs.
DetlefK
Apr 2018
#51
Easy. You rub their cheek with a nipple. They reflexively turn toward it with an open mouth,
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#326
Apparently noisy public places are suddenly unsafe for babies, who can't nurse there...
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#176
Breastfed babies nurse off and on. They fall asleep after breastfeeding and if they're hungry again
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#325
Exactly. The wheels of state will not come to a grinding halt if a baby nurses every few hours
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#241
Well, she's trying to get the conversation started for more workplaces where it is possible
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#294
In what way will a nursing baby once every few hours "inconvenience" others on the Senate floor?
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#242
I thought you said that people are bringing kids in to the office and are disruptive
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#302
After they tell her that "they are only concerned with what is best for the baby and mother"
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#247
Thanks, and I agree. I was just horrified to think she would be forced to use a bathroom.
Tipperary
Apr 2018
#202
Careful, That's what I'm promoting and I was excoriated & accused of "mansplaining"tho I'm FEMALE!
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#220
That would be great - there are way more female employees in the Senate than just Senators.
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#304
Once babies are officially allowed on the floor, it will be appropriate...
S.E. TN Liberal
Apr 2018
#200
How card is it to just bring in some sort of opaque screen or something and a nice small couch
Afromania
Apr 2018
#203
Or better yet how hard is it to have the baby wait for the few minutes it takes to vote.
Egnever
Apr 2018
#216
I don't enjoy being around babies because I have forgotten babies are human?
Act_of_Reparation
Apr 2018
#253
Your enjoyment or non-enjoyment is beside the point. This is about a woman Senator's
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#254
No, much of the discussion here is broader than one woman in the Senate.
Act_of_Reparation
Apr 2018
#257
The OP is about Duckworth's attempt to bring in her nursing baby and not exclude herself
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#258
When did I say that "people should be bringing their infants to the workplace?"
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#315
Nursing babies belong in any non-dangerous public place that mothers belong in.
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#231
It's just behind other countries, in terms of what is done there to accomodate families
ehrnst
Apr 2018
#311
I really can't understand what everyone's (or some) problem is with this, they're losing the context
George II
Apr 2018
#259
I know. It's so overblown. I can't figure out why some people are so threatened by this.
pnwmom
Apr 2018
#260
OK, kids. It's essentially saying that a Senator with a child under one can bring that child
Squinch
Apr 2018
#266
What about them? If some guy wants to carry his 6 month old grandchild onto the senate
Squinch
Apr 2018
#276
The reply to my reply must have been a doozie! And I didn't even get to see it!
Squinch
Apr 2018
#336
Didn't see if anyone posted it here, but the Senate approved the rule change unanimously:
George II
Apr 2018
#281