Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OhioBlue

(5,202 posts)
6. I have had the same thought for a long time.
Fri Apr 20, 2018, 11:23 PM
Apr 2018

I agree with everything you said. I think it increased the divide in Congress and reps/Senators from the same State but different parties may still find issues to collaborate on, but they seem to then retreat to their respective party camps.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I've had that same thought as well. procon Apr 2018 #1
I've been saying that for years. meadowlark5 Apr 2018 #2
Are we arguing in favor of bringing back earmarks? oberliner Apr 2018 #3
Well its naive to think government can happen without some horse trading, everyone does it for bettyellen Apr 2018 #4
Obama: "If a bill comes to my desk with earmarks inside, I will veto it." oberliner Apr 2018 #5
Yeah, Im aware they obtained a bad reputation because they got out of hand. Your point? bettyellen Apr 2018 #9
That is my point oberliner Apr 2018 #11
You don't end things you improve them...the fact is Congress has not worked together since. Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #14
Sorry, I'm with Obama on this one oberliner Apr 2018 #16
It would help advance more deals and send road money to the states which will never happen Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #20
Thanks- if a person cant distinguish between making a fair deal and corruption- bettyellen Apr 2018 #18
I agree. Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #19
I love Pres. Obama but I don't agree with this. Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #13
Yes I am in favor of bringing back earmarks. Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #15
I have had the same thought for a long time. OhioBlue Apr 2018 #6
In the search for perfection, the Law of Unintended Consequences bites back. n/t elocs Apr 2018 #7
The whole public perception of earmarks is wrong. Scruffy1 Apr 2018 #8
Like anything, it can be abused and was Lee-Lee Apr 2018 #23
It keeps reps from bringing jobs to their districts the easy way so they don't even try anymore TeamPooka Apr 2018 #10
That is true...and it helped states with road projects too. Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #12
Yep. We threw out the baby with the bath water. Blue_Adept Apr 2018 #17
Yes it was a foolish thing to do...and in our quest for purity...we made things worse. Demsrule86 Apr 2018 #21
Exactly Blue_Adept Apr 2018 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thought: The ban of earma...»Reply #6