Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:36 PM Jul 2012

It's Official: Drinking Fluoridated Water Lowers IQ [View all]

[font size=3]Harvard Study Finds Fluoride Lowers IQ - Published in Federal Gov't Journal[/font]

Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:45am EDT
PR Newswire


NEW YORK, July 24, 2012 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Harvard University researchers' review of fluoride/brain studies concludes "our results support the possibility of adverse effects of fluoride exposures on children's neurodevelopment." It was published online July 20 in Environmental Health Perspectives, a US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences' journal (1), reports the NYS Coalition Opposed to Fluoridation, Inc. (NYSCOF)

"The children in high fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ than those who lived in low fluoride areas," write Choi et al. Further, the EPA says fluoride is a chemical "with substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity." Fluoride (fluosilicic acid) is added to US water supplies at approximately 1 part per million attempting to reduce tooth decay.

Water was the only fluoride source in the studies reviewed and was based on high water fluoride levels. However, they point out research by Ding (2011) suggested that low water fluoride levels had significant negative associations with children's intelligence.

Choi et al. write, "Although fluoride may cause neurotoxicity in animal models and acute fluoride poisoning causes neurotoxicity in adults, very little is known of its effects on children's neurodevelopment. They recommend more brain/fluoride research on children and at individual-level doses.

"It's senseless to keep subjecting our children to this ongoing fluoridation experiment to satisfy the political agenda of special-interest groups," says attorney Paul Beeber, NYSCOF President. "Even if fluoridation reduced cavities, is tooth health more important than brain health? It's time to put politics aside and stop artificial fluoridation everywhere," says Beeber.

Article link: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/24/idUS127920+24-Jul-2012+PRN20120724


Study Abstract:



[font size=3]Developmental Fluoride Neurotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[/font]

Anna L. Choi, Guifan Sun, Ying Zhang, Philippe Grandjean


Background: Although fluoride may cause neurotoxicity in animal models and acute fluoride poisoning causes neurotoxicity in adults, very little is known of its effects on children’s neurodevelopment.

Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to investigate the effects of increased fluoride exposure and delayed neurobehavioral development.

Methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Water Resources Abstracts, and TOXNET databases through 2011 for eligible studies. We also searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database, as many studies on fluoride neurotoxicity have been published in Chinese journals only. In total, we identified 27 eligible epidemiological studies with high and reference exposures, endpoints of IQ scores or related cognitive function measures with means and variances for the two exposure groups. We estimated the standardized mean difference (SMD) between exposed and reference groups across all studies using random effects models. We conducted sensitivity analyses restricted to studies using the same outcome assessment and having drinking water fluoride as the only exposure. Cochran test for heterogeneity between studies, Begg’s funnel plot and Egger test to assess publication bias were performed. Meta-regressions to explore sources of variation in mean differences among the studies were conducted.

Results: The standardized weighted mean difference in IQ score between exposed and reference populations was -0.45 (95% CI -0.56 to -0.35) using a random-effects model. Thus, children in high fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low fluoride areas. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses also indicated inverse associations, although the substantial heterogeneity did not appear to decrease.

Conclusions: The results support the possibility of an adverse effect of high fluoride exposure on children’s neurodevelopment. Future research should include detailed individual-level information on prenatal exposure, neurobehavioral performance, and covariates for adjustment.

Citation: Choi AL, Sun G, Zhang Y, Grandjean P 2012. Developmental Fluoride Neurotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Environ Health Perspect :-. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104912

Received: 30 December 2011; Accepted: 20 July 2012; Online: 20 July 2012


Article link: http://ehp03.niehs.nih.gov/article/fetchArticle.action;jsessionid=5C98A897B69464FD44D98698EE9FC4A1?articleURI=info%3Adoi%2F10.1289%2Fehp.1104912



- How many scientific studies does it take to unscrew this lightbulb?!?!?!?!
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alex Jones' head may explode with delight over this news. nt bbernardini Jul 2012 #1
I'm okay with that. Igel Jul 2012 #56
Fluoride is also a key dumbing down ingredient of Prozac and Sarin nerve gas. midnight Jul 2012 #2
Exactly. DeSwiss Jul 2012 #29
You never took chemistry did you? Confusious Jul 2012 #54
I did.... But those S P orbitals about did me in... midnight Jul 2012 #69
then you must know Confusious Jul 2012 #70
That link is bad, current packed it bags... Historic NY Jul 2015 #71
In answer to your "How many studies?" question jberryhill Jul 2012 #3
The question was rhetorical but thanks for your input. n/t DeSwiss Jul 2012 #4
The distortion is also rhetorical jberryhill Jul 2012 #6
But the EPA's science is not. n/t DeSwiss Jul 2012 #13
My opinion about this particular case is "further studies" is code for stonewalling the truth... midnight Jul 2012 #12
More articles from Susanne Posel at theintelhub... SidDithers Jul 2012 #17
Sorry this link congers up so many objections for you.But before I suggest you review another link. midnight Jul 2012 #60
Whatever. You shot your credibility with Susanne Posel... SidDithers Jul 2012 #64
Right, because if there's only a *chance* that we're harming children, The Doctor. Jul 2012 #39
Trading a known benefit for an unknown chance? jberryhill Jul 2012 #41
Nope.... DeSwiss Jul 2012 #49
There are lots of things that may hurt children. Igel Jul 2012 #58
No, it's not... SidDithers Jul 2012 #5
Yeah, I've always thought..... DeSwiss Jul 2012 #14
And the CDC thinks it is "Single most effective public health measure to prevent tooth decay"... SidDithers Jul 2012 #23
So the CDC says its GREAT! DeSwiss Jul 2012 #33
But neither EPA nor Harvard actually say that jberryhill Jul 2012 #34
Sorry. DeSwiss Jul 2012 #37
You should make commercials for the Romney campaign jberryhill Jul 2012 #42
No, I prefer facts. DeSwiss Jul 2012 #50
I addressed both of those things jberryhill Jul 2012 #53
So is the level of F ions in US drinking water like that of the high F areas? Igel Jul 2012 #59
This guy is lying though, right? redqueen Jul 2012 #7
I know, I know. DeSwiss Jul 2012 #27
Most ironic post in the thread...nt SidDithers Jul 2012 #36
Oddly, some can describe irony..... DeSwiss Jul 2012 #40
Is "official" the new word for Possible? cthulu2016 Jul 2012 #8
Nuh-uh..... DeSwiss Jul 2012 #20
This does explain the City of Grand Rapids Michigan. slampoet Jul 2012 #9
What's the level of fluoride in those high fluoride areas studied? muriel_volestrangler Jul 2012 #10
Oh noes, our precious bodily fluids!!! Odin2005 Jul 2012 #11
You beat me to it! FSogol Jul 2012 #24
I blame the aliens! HappyMe Jul 2012 #35
You mean you don't trust results from Chinese journals Johonny Jul 2012 #63
This looks like a job for......... Swede Jul 2012 #15
lol! Mr. Woo himself! HappyMe Jul 2012 #16
Ummm. we grew up with fluoridated water. My IQ is 150. progressivebydesign Jul 2012 #18
I think ... "regular Einstein" ... is an oxymoron. JoePhilly Jul 2012 #28
I knew this for years Ter Jul 2012 #19
Well if it is..... DeSwiss Jul 2012 #22
But my toofs ar purlee wite Glassunion Jul 2012 #21
Our pediatricians' yearly checkup includes a questionnaire MorningGlow Jul 2012 #25
So.... this guy only looks dumb? qb Jul 2012 #26
Ten Great Public Health Achievements -- United States, 1900-1999... SidDithers Jul 2012 #30
Like you say: ''Ligthten up Francis.'' DeSwiss Jul 2012 #48
So we never use x-rays anymore, right? jeff47 Jul 2012 #68
Well, they got in the essential narrative for science--They recommend more research HereSince1628 Jul 2012 #31
By all means.... DeSwiss Jul 2012 #44
It's standard bio-speak, and I think science writers/editors expect to include it HereSince1628 Jul 2012 #47
One study says "there's a possibility" Confusious Jul 2012 #57
Circumcision, however, prevents this side effect. closeupready Jul 2012 #32
Wasn't this the John Birch Society's big fear? Taverner Jul 2012 #38
ever seen a commie drink a glas of water? arely staircase Jul 2012 #43
So does this explain Florida and Texas? ananda Jul 2012 #45
The correlation between..... DeSwiss Jul 2012 #52
Could be. I grew up in Florida. RebelOne Jul 2012 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author arely staircase Jul 2012 #46
Fluoride lobotomies? Trillo Jul 2012 #51
I think EVERYONE HERE knows Harvard is a breeding ground for tinfoil hat crackpots. Zalatix Jul 2012 #61
Please make me a drink of grain alcohol and rain water, and help yourself to whatever you want slackmaster Jul 2012 #62
We need much better science education in our country jeff47 Jul 2012 #65
But Harvard!!! And the EPA!!!... SidDithers Jul 2012 #66
Yellow teeth vs. intelligence apples and oranges Jul 2012 #67
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's Official: Drinking F...