General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary a weak candidate? [View all]mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)What Comey actually told Congress was pretty damn innocuous if you actually go back and read the letter.
And if she'd just won, nobody would've given the tiniest of shits about what he did. Consider that for a minute sometime.
It never should have been blown into the breathless headlines it was, harped about for days in the media ... given the ACTUAL CONTENT of the letter and REALITY of the situation at hand.
If we didn't have a purely profit-driven media, that not only craved eyeballs and clicks for the short-term when the letter was sent, but also smelled mega-bucks coming their way for 4 years if Dump was to actually win, they wouldn't have misrepresented the nature of Comey's letter the way they did.
If Comey hadn't done what he did, Guiliani would've made sure that the media 'found out', and it very easily could've ended up looking even worse for Hillary ... then the fucking media would've 'agonized' endlessly about whether the FBI was 'in the tank for Hillary' and hence 'looked the other way' in the investigations of the email server and the CF.
IMHO, it's time to stop with the blame Comey bullshit and blame the PROPER people ... the media, the GOP, Guiliani, the NY FBI field office who got the laptop and elected to blab to Rudy and play politics with it, and NON-VOTERS who stayed home.
FACT: Nobody knows what would've happened if Comey had 'said nothing' as so many have blithely suggested. It ain't that fucking simple as 'he says nothing, and it never become a story' ... there were people who were DETERMINED to MAKE IT a story, no matter what Comey said or didn't say. They are (among) the proper ones to blame here, IMHO.