Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I figured there would be a take down attempt once Joy Ann Reid & Jane Sanders had [View all]Gothmog
(180,116 posts)35. The Joy Reid Saga: The Wayback Machine cannot guarantee authenticity
The wayback machine does not guarantee anything https://burningbird.net/the-joy-reid-saga-the-wayback-machine-cannot-guarantee-authenticity/#.WuDw69w6PTy.twitter
The same cannot be said for the actual Wayback Machine archives.
The Wayback Machine is an invaluable historical record of the web. Through it, Ive been able to recover past writings lost because of all the many changes Ive made to my web site. Its a wonderful way of exploring the webs history.
However, the Wayback Machine is not, and never has been, a definitive source of the authenticity of what it captures on the web. It has access to a web page at a specific location at a specific time but no special privilege that allows it to determine the authenticity of the author of the content in the page.
As noted by Chris Butler at the Internet Archives, home organization for the Wayback Machine:
Pages archived at different dates and by different entities... This statement is key to understanding the difference between Wayback Machines archival functionality as separate from the medias assumption of Wayback Machine as Super Authenticator, able to leap tall metadata with a single bound!
The Wayback Machine is an invaluable historical record of the web. Through it, Ive been able to recover past writings lost because of all the many changes Ive made to my web site. Its a wonderful way of exploring the webs history.
However, the Wayback Machine is not, and never has been, a definitive source of the authenticity of what it captures on the web. It has access to a web page at a specific location at a specific time but no special privilege that allows it to determine the authenticity of the author of the content in the page.
As noted by Chris Butler at the Internet Archives, home organization for the Wayback Machine:
When we reviewed the archives, we found nothing to indicate tampering or hacking of the Wayback Machine versions. At least some of the examples of allegedly fraudulent posts provided to us had been archived at different dates and by different entities.
Pages archived at different dates and by different entities... This statement is key to understanding the difference between Wayback Machines archival functionality as separate from the medias assumption of Wayback Machine as Super Authenticator, able to leap tall metadata with a single bound!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I figured there would be a take down attempt once Joy Ann Reid & Jane Sanders had [View all]
ecstatic
Apr 2018
OP
Huh, maybe @ggreenwald can explain his blatant racism from 2005 in between holier than thought
Cha
Apr 2018
#27
Huh, maybe @ggreenwald can explain his blatant racism from 2005 in between holier than thought
Cha
Apr 2018
#25