General Discussion

uponit7771

(93,532 posts)

53. Again, she's already apologized for those post there's no reason why she would have

Thu Apr 26, 2018, 03:35 AM

Apr 2018

... say anything more to the people who have enough grace to move on.

Why in the hell would she have to say the post pushed by Breitbart et all (which are not in the OP) are false?

That's beyond insane

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

137 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm a fan of Joy Reid - also a fan of the truth... [View all] Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 OP

Wow, nice catch. Also notice that there are no comments on that article Azathoth Apr 2018 #1

Interesting, but not conclusive. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2018 #57

If her lawyer was actually enough of a fuckwit to bring in the FBI she has bigger problems. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #2

She has plausible deniability Azathoth Apr 2018 #15

Again, she's already apologized for those post there's no reason why she would have uponit7771 Apr 2018 #53

Why did she apologize for hacked posts? Azathoth Apr 2018 #55

She's not, she's saying they're hacked ... damn, what am I missing ?! uponit7771 Apr 2018 #60

You just said she apologized for the posts. Now you're saying she didn't Azathoth Apr 2018 #61

She's not apologizing for inartful post she didn't write herself, what about that is confusing !?!? uponit7771 Apr 2018 #92

She apologized for some posts about Charlie Crist, those are separate from mythology Apr 2018 #120

The fact that they brought in the FBI, knowing the risk, is a positive indication... InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2018 #62

Nope, she's not telling the truth. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #64

Okay, so maybe the hacked blog post was what was archived years ago. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2018 #69

Only if it was "hacked" within 3 days of being posted. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #72

Which is possible to be hacked within seconds of being posted uponit7771 Apr 2018 #76

And possible for someone with an active blog to not notice a post they didn't write, themselves? Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #79

Well, the large audience she had at the time didn't notice either which adds to her point uponit7771 Apr 2018 #82

it was archived three days after it was posted Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #83

Spider, it takes seconds to hack and seconds to spoof a post ... come on man uponit7771 Apr 2018 #84

Yes, but it's exceptionally implausible... Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #85

It's even more implausible that no one else noticed the posting or she didn't get crap uponit7771 Apr 2018 #86

Because of her acknowledged history of homophobic blog posts re Charlie Crist? Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #87

No, at the time in 2007 she had a progressive audience and editors that would've jumped uponit7771 Apr 2018 #89

She *admitted* and *apologised for* the things she said about Crist. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #91

Cause a couple of trillion people noticed, like they did in 2007 right? ... NO !!! Cause those... uponit7771 Apr 2018 #94

Here, in case you missed it Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #96

We agree on the date, looks like we differ on whether someone would've said something to her uponit7771 Apr 2018 #97

She was a little-known regional radio host with a little-read blog Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #99

Joan Walsh disagrees with that assessment about "little" I'll accept her knowledge of the Reid. uponit7771 Apr 2018 #101

Comments aren't archived because they're on a separate page. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #104

Not all comments sections are on different pages uponit7771 Apr 2018 #105

But these are. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #106

I don't see those pages being archived elsewhere I also give Reid TBOTD seeing nothing about her uponit7771 Apr 2018 #107

'immediate backlash against the Crist post' melman Apr 2018 #102

Relatively speaking yes it did uponit7771 Apr 2018 #103

So calling in the proper authories to investigate is an automatic sign of guilt? TheSmarterDog Apr 2018 #133

Joy Reid is not anti-gay and she apologized for insensitive inartful post of the past. Few if any .. uponit7771 Apr 2018 #3

We can prove she's lying Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #4

That's not proof she's lying when scrapers like LoC and TWBM pic up changes to sites that uponit7771 Apr 2018 #5

If the site had been changed then that would appear with a newer archival timestamp Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #7

You didn't post the blog inputs her experts says were spoofed, again I'm skeptical uponit7771 Apr 2018 #9

It's not my fault you don't understand how archiving works. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #13

I understand ad homs via condescension, usually a tactic when one can't back up a claim uponit7771 Apr 2018 #48

Here you go: Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #49

Link and quote her saying this was hacked, again ... I want to read it from her or her uponit7771 Apr 2018 #56

Right here: Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #58

Again, words she's already apologized for EVEN IF THEY WERE HERS. I'll give her TBOTD when uponit7771 Apr 2018 #65

Nope, she hasn't apologised for it, she's claimed it was "hacked" (n/t) Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #70

No she has not apologized melman Apr 2018 #63

Yes, that's true but for the latest comments that recently came to light... InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2018 #66

This is false on its face, she did apologize for post she's written in the past she has not uponit7771 Apr 2018 #67

What? melman Apr 2018 #75

Don't know what's confusing about not having to apologize for something she didn't do uponit7771 Apr 2018 #77

I don't think she's anti-gay anymore...I agree. Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #6

I'm skeptical, you're posting about what she's apologized for in the past and not the post uponit7771 Apr 2018 #8

She hasn't referenced the post I mentioned... Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #10

Then she apologized for her comments in the past already, I covered that. Reid isn't Anti-gay uponit7771 Apr 2018 #11

No she didn't. Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #14

Yeah, she did ... sigh uponit7771 Apr 2018 #24

Na'. She apologized for her posts on Charlie Crist. Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #25

BULL SHIT !!! Her quotes right here !! uponit7771 Apr 2018 #29

My bad. I apologize. Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #31

The issue is there were more post that came up through an archive search that are about uponit7771 Apr 2018 #37

She posted em, tho. Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #71

She's saying she didn't and the FBI is looking into it, she's earned the TBOTD. I think that's uponit7771 Apr 2018 #74

Heres the letter in its entirety. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #52

Thank you for Joy's apology, uponit. Cha Apr 2018 #88

NP, Some are trying to say Reid is anti-gay when there's nothing about her that says such uponit7771 Apr 2018 #90

This message was self-deleted by its author Dr Hobbitstein Apr 2018 #131

the snickers commercial? really? I thought it was cute, but yeah there were probably cretins who hlthe2b Apr 2018 #12

+1, all of this noise is to claim Reid is anti-gay. The one thing I would've changed in the uponit7771 Apr 2018 #17

This is what she said... Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #18

Well, I don't agree with her assessment, but hopefully I hang out with more enlightened people hlthe2b Apr 2018 #21

She apologized for her Crist comments. She claims these posts were all hacked. Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #22

Well, I'm going to give her benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise. hlthe2b Apr 2018 #36

Reid actually apologized about ALL of her post not just the Christ one (link) uponit7771 Apr 2018 #44

++++ hlthe2b Apr 2018 #45

Heres the entire apology Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2018 #59

seems pretty comprehensive to me, even if she chose the Crist issue to focus on... hlthe2b Apr 2018 #78

IKR !! At this point it looks like some are just pushing some true bullshit uponit7771 Apr 2018 #80

+1, she apologized and moved on. They're working overtime to present her as anti-gay uponit7771 Apr 2018 #26

Wow melman Apr 2018 #16

Sigh, there's no claim of hacking the post in the OP and the OP hasn't posted what uponit7771 Apr 2018 #19

Why are you so eager to see a liberal peabody Apr 2018 #20

I don't accept your framing melman Apr 2018 #23

Even after she apologized for them, Reid is not anti-gay ... uponit7771 Apr 2018 #30

Don't be sorry; just face peabody Apr 2018 #35

You notice the excitement. NCTraveler Apr 2018 #129

I'm as non-homophobic as a man could be ... in fact, I've smoked a pole or two on occasion ... mr_lebowski Apr 2018 #27

Are you repulsed by two men kissing? Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #28

She's saying AMERICANS are repulsed by it, why throw this bullshit ass'd shade?! uponit7771 Apr 2018 #32

lol no she's not. She's definitely including herself among those. Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #34

In the Hardaway post not the second one of two men kissing. I don't see where she said ".. I..." uponit7771 Apr 2018 #39

She said she couldn't watch Brokeback Mountain... Drunken Irishman Apr 2018 #68

People can desire ... or NOT desire ... to watch certain intimate acts ... mr_lebowski Apr 2018 #93

I do not want to watch two males having sex ......... stonecutter357 Apr 2018 #126

I clarified in my edit, and the answer is ... yeah ... more or less. mr_lebowski Apr 2018 #33

+1, I don't like movies where black men are sexualized by white women or teenage sex uponit7771 Apr 2018 #42

Exactly. We all 'have our things we don't especially care to watch' but that doesn't mean ... mr_lebowski Apr 2018 #51

RIGHT !!! uponit7771 Apr 2018 #73

I can't answer your question, but too much PDA hlthe2b Apr 2018 #38

Sorry ... maybe I went too far in establishing my bona-fides ;) mr_lebowski Apr 2018 #40

Oh,hell I can talk about anything. It is sitting there with no where to look except to stare... hlthe2b Apr 2018 #41

Fair enough ... what I'm really getting at is it's a far cry from 'homophobia' for someone to say .. mr_lebowski Apr 2018 #46

I get your point... hlthe2b Apr 2018 #47

Glad we agree in the end :) (nt) mr_lebowski Apr 2018 #54

Yesterday's papers tirebiter Apr 2018 #43

I'm Tired bluestateboomer Apr 2018 #50

Besides my other random ramblings on this thread can I just say ... I've known a lot of women ... mr_lebowski Apr 2018 #81

She is NOT saying they are all fake. She is saying some were altered. pnwmom Apr 2018 #95

Seems to me like Putin is winning, again ... (nt) mr_lebowski Apr 2018 #98

The claim is "screenshot manipulation" Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #100

It's sad that she appears to be lying janterry Apr 2018 #109

SOME archived versions could have been manipulated, too. The one claim doesn't exclude the other. pnwmom Apr 2018 #110

There are timestamps of the date of archival. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #112

In view of everything that's happened this year, including the alteration of the DNC emails, pnwmom Apr 2018 #113

The second alternative is not, in fact plausible Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #114

There is nothing implausible about the idea that Russian hackers could embellish and alter pnwmom Apr 2018 #115

So could the fact that casual homophobia was more acceptable a decade ago Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #116

That's a dead link. n/t pnwmom Apr 2018 #117

Works fine for me. Spider Jerusalem Apr 2018 #118

This is the message I get. pnwmom Apr 2018 #121

Works for me too. progressoid Apr 2018 #130

It's obvious to me that there was no hack. Captain Stern Apr 2018 #135

This message was self-deleted by its author Cha Apr 2018 #108

Here's my surprised face... Adrahil Apr 2018 #127

Ikr.. You saw it was Cha Apr 2018 #128

Could it be Crutchez_CuiBono Apr 2018 #111

What would it take for people to believe these posts were not hacked? oberliner Apr 2018 #119

The network says they've turned info over to the FBI, which is investigating. pnwmom Apr 2018 #122

The FBI will probably say nothing oberliner Apr 2018 #123

If they indict someone they will. n/t pnwmom Apr 2018 #124

Ask why now? Why her? Adrahil Apr 2018 #125

He is my 2nd favorite Celtic of all time. nt LexVegas Apr 2018 #132

A hacker could see some comments and then treestar Apr 2018 #134

Because she is not claiming all are hacks mercuryblues Apr 2018 #136

And the DU post date is the SAME as Joy Reid's post date. scipan Apr 2018 #137