Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I've read a lot of dumb stupid misogynist shit on this website over the years. [View all]MRA (Men's Rights Movement) https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Men%27s_rights_movement
The men's rights movement (MRM, also known as men's rights activism (MRA), masculism, or "The Men's Human Rights Movement"[2]) is a fringe movement which espouses the view that social, legal and economic discrimination against males is present in society to the extent that fighting it deserves an organized effort mirroring that of feminism, and crucially, that any and all variants of feminism do society and the individual far more harm than good.
There are two distinct age ranges for Men's Rights Activists: group one consists of adolescent boys aged 12-16, and group two is mainly inhabited by young adult males in the early 20s to late 30s range. The most prominent MRA media and literature consist of memes circulated on sites such as iFunny or 4chan, as well as YouTube channels run by fundamentalists or, unfortunately, New Atheists.
Based on their insistence that men are held back by women at least as much as women are by men (if not more so), combined with a general adherence to neo-reactionary strains of anti-progressivism within the movement, MRAs hold the entirety of modern feminism to be an inherently unequal attempt to worsen the "already equally unfair" balance of rights and responsibilities between the sexes by selfishly putting women even further ahead.
The men's rights movement (MRM, also known as men's rights activism (MRA), masculism, or "The Men's Human Rights Movement"[2]) is a fringe movement which espouses the view that social, legal and economic discrimination against males is present in society to the extent that fighting it deserves an organized effort mirroring that of feminism, and crucially, that any and all variants of feminism do society and the individual far more harm than good.
There are two distinct age ranges for Men's Rights Activists: group one consists of adolescent boys aged 12-16, and group two is mainly inhabited by young adult males in the early 20s to late 30s range. The most prominent MRA media and literature consist of memes circulated on sites such as iFunny or 4chan, as well as YouTube channels run by fundamentalists or, unfortunately, New Atheists.
Based on their insistence that men are held back by women at least as much as women are by men (if not more so), combined with a general adherence to neo-reactionary strains of anti-progressivism within the movement, MRAs hold the entirety of modern feminism to be an inherently unequal attempt to worsen the "already equally unfair" balance of rights and responsibilities between the sexes by selfishly putting women even further ahead.
JPR is Jackpine Radicals (website to which I won't link), full of, let's just say "former" (banned) or "disenchanted" grudge-holding former DUers, and probably various like minded initiates of various types, but with a lot of pro-Russian propagandists from time to time. I'm sure you can find site, if so inclined.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've read a lot of dumb stupid misogynist shit on this website over the years. [View all]
boston bean
Apr 2018
OP
Most people here are not fans of JPR, yet you come here and say it is "better than DU"
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#48
No one who states they think " JPR is better than DU in some ways" has ANY right to tell ANY DUer
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#51
You have no right to tell me or any DUer to post or not post, especially when you espouse JPR
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#53
So you go to your next door neighbor's house and remark on how much nicer is the neighbor's across
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#69
Again, if you think the TOS allow for promoting that or any other conspiracy anti-Democratic website
hlthe2b
Apr 2018
#78
I wouldn't worry about that person, they intentionally misstate the position of the person they
stevenleser
Apr 2018
#97
I a mostly try to explain, then when met with hostiility become hostile myself! LOL
boston bean
Apr 2018
#20
The notion of "outside looking in" is one I had never considered before.
BobTheSubgenius
Apr 2018
#7
Not an easy thing to admit cause one might feel shame. But in that honesty you are free!
boston bean
Apr 2018
#22
I really appreciate that! I am no perfect angel and will probably never be.
boston bean
Apr 2018
#11
I agree. I'm getting tired of this career execution of people because of prior things...
Honeycombe8
Apr 2018
#28
A simple apology is a simple apology. An apology given from the heart with an explanation as to why
boston bean
Apr 2018
#39
Pretty unconvincing rationalization that ignores the "why" of this situation
stevenleser
Apr 2018
#83
Thank you for confirming that this is how a slice of Sanders supporters view this
stevenleser
Apr 2018
#86
Yes and the sky is blue. Are there any other irrelevant pieces of information
stevenleser
Apr 2018
#88
The nut job and prejudice are probably true. But again, a certain segment of Sanders supporters
stevenleser
Apr 2018
#96
Yes, it's miscreant behavior, particularly when it is directed at Joy and various other people as
stevenleser
Apr 2018
#101
Shifted from Joy? How about you try rereading the OP again to remind yourself what all this is about
stevenleser
Apr 2018
#108
Um yes, as another example of what was done to Joy. There are other examples
stevenleser
Apr 2018
#111
Do you not like finding and disseminating candidates' "racist or homophobic posts?"
David__77
Apr 2018
#95
No, I don't like discovering that people are bigots. And I am not happy when thats a part of a
stevenleser
Apr 2018
#99
Reread my post again and see if you can respond to what I actually wrote instead of a straw man. nt
stevenleser
Apr 2018
#109