General Discussion

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)

9. Now, if Norm can convince his "purity" compatriots of the reality he now sees.

Reply to CousinIT (Original post)

Sun Apr 29, 2018, 09:42 AM

Apr 2018

It would be greatly appreciated by everyone that love this country and the world.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Noam Chomsky: 'The Republican Party is the most dangerous organization in human history' [View all] CousinIT Apr 2018 OP

The Reps are just the modern Nazis. IluvPitties Apr 2018 #1

It's bad exboyfil Apr 2018 #2

yup, as were the communist parties of Stalin and Mao. Shark jumping Amishman Apr 2018 #10

But were/are those organizations so committed to destroying the entire planet for profit? pangaia Apr 2018 #27

Given a long enough timeline, I'd expect the answer would have been yes Amishman Apr 2018 #36

I disagree, but only because of nukes & climate change. CrispyQ Apr 2018 #30

K&R smirkymonkey Apr 2018 #3

Any group composed of just conservatives is a danger to the planet, the people, and to peace. nm S.E. TN Liberal Apr 2018 #4

Noam Chomsky: Progressives who refused to vote for Hillary Clinton made a 'bad mistake' still_one Apr 2018 #5

+1 dalton99a Apr 2018 #7

i wish chomsky, a media scholar, would also stop ignoring talk radio. that common attitude is why certainot Apr 2018 #23

Wow. That was powerful!! Ferrets are Cool Apr 2018 #6

Keep it kicked BSdetect Apr 2018 #8

Now, if Norm can convince his "purity" compatriots of the reality he now sees. Blue_true Apr 2018 #9

A little late for that eh. ucrdem Apr 2018 #11

I don't think it takes a political genius to recognize this. ooky Apr 2018 #12

If it weren't for republicans, there wouldn't be fossil fuel production anywhere on earth? hughee99 Apr 2018 #13

Is this the same Chomsky who said the two parties are indistinguishable? Bucky Apr 2018 #14

Yes, I believe this is the same guy. hughee99 Apr 2018 #17

He is not incorrrect. LiberalLovinLug Apr 2018 #25

I agree with you on this. pangaia Apr 2018 #29

He is incorrect Bucky Apr 2018 #35

It's the same Chomsky who said not voting for Hillary Clinton would be a huge mistake. Garrett78 Apr 2018 #34

He's been saying this for years. geomon666 Apr 2018 #15

Well if had to choose between Mao or Pol Pot or Tamerlane... EX500rider Apr 2018 #16

I have said that for a couple of decades now... IthinkThereforeIAM Apr 2018 #18

I believe that it's not that they intent to destroy. BobTheSubgenius Apr 2018 #19

absolutely Locrian Apr 2018 #26

Until #45, I would have agreed. But Steve Bannon had malice aforethought. VOX Apr 2018 #28

Kicking pandr32 Apr 2018 #20

K & R SunSeeker Apr 2018 #21

More dangerous than the Nazi Party? Or Pol Pot's regime? Or Stalin's Communist Party? Nitram Apr 2018 #22

True. But in terms of potential destructiveness, 45 has nukes. VOX Apr 2018 #31

I guess I think the whole idea of calling anything or anyone the most whatever in history is totally Nitram Apr 2018 #32

Well he is talking about total human annihilation, which would be bigger than previous scourges. JCanete Apr 2018 #38

Global warming is potentially the end of civilization DBoon Apr 2018 #41

Trump is also a great danger to democracy and civilized ideals. triron Apr 2018 #42

No wonder I feel so angry at Trump et al. triron Apr 2018 #24

kick for visibility triron Apr 2018 #33

I only take issue with the notion that any fascist state, like Nazi Germany, JCanete Apr 2018 #37

kick for visibility triron Apr 2018 #39

kick for visibility triron Apr 2018 #40

rec triron Apr 2018 #43

kick again triron Apr 2018 #44

K&R Scurrilous Apr 2018 #45