General Discussion

raouldukelives

(5,178 posts)

40. Some people think exploiting the earth and profiting from climate change is cool.

Reply to SalviaBlue (Reply #22)

Wed Aug 1, 2012, 10:50 AM

Aug 2012

I call them investors.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No to �fracking� doesn�t mean no: Landowner refusal can�t stop drilling [View all] HiPointDem Jul 2012 OP

My question: Where are the Teabaggers and the militias? redgreenandblue Jul 2012 #1

Good question... KansDem Jul 2012 #2

Anytime.. 12ZTR Jul 2012 #3

Who cares who they voted for? DiverDave Jul 2012 #4

Some things transcend politics and some people need to lay in the bed they made leftyohiolib Jul 2012 #9

Yes they do, but theft DiverDave Jul 2012 #26

This message was self-deleted by its author leftyohiolib Aug 2012 #39

You wont give us your mineral rights. We'll take them. fasttense Jul 2012 #5

All those tea baggers flobee1 Jul 2012 #6

This is true, at least in some states--enough of your neighbors sign on, and you're TwilightGardener Jul 2012 #7

This guy should form a LLC and sell himself the mineral rights. Loudestlib Jul 2012 #8

What difference would that make? badtoworse Jul 2012 #11

Interesting twist on the subject?.....I guess that just as we do not own the airspace above our prop lostnote12 Jul 2012 #32

You own the mineral rights, unless they've been sold, which is common in some parts of the country badtoworse Jul 2012 #35

Force Pooling Has Been Around For Many, Many Years. (nt) Paladin Jul 2012 #10

They won't be drilling on his property or building roads or pipelines badtoworse Jul 2012 #12

Right! Plus, he still has his 2nd amendment rights. Chef Eric Jul 2012 #13

What an erudite response. badtoworse Jul 2012 #14

Thank you. Chef Eric Jul 2012 #18

Gasland is a crock, a politically motivated hit piece. badtoworse Jul 2012 #20

Oh please SalviaBlue Jul 2012 #22

It's not a question of bad. The issue is risk. badtoworse Jul 2012 #23

They say that water is SAFE?? DiverDave Jul 2012 #28

Actually, it was the EPA that said it was safe to drink. badtoworse Jul 2012 #34

Some people think exploiting the earth and profiting from climate change is cool. raouldukelives Aug 2012 #40

Some people don't care if the lights stay on, people can drive or whether homes stay warm in winter. badtoworse Aug 2012 #41

Speaking of homes staying warm in the winter. raouldukelives Aug 2012 #42

We don't have the technology to get off fossil fuels anytime soon. badtoworse Aug 2012 #43

And we never will have one at this rate. raouldukelives Aug 2012 #44

Maybe he was planning on giving the oil and gas to his grandkids? Hassin Bin Sober Jul 2012 #27

You do realize that Politicalboi Jul 2012 #29

It has happened in a small number of cases,... badtoworse Jul 2012 #36

Gasland part deux triplepoint Jul 2012 #15

The EPA investigated the water in Dimock and has declared it safe badtoworse Jul 2012 #16

Nice Try. Thanks for Playing/Trolling Though. triplepoint Jul 2012 #21

That's baloney badtoworse Jul 2012 #24

Cabot was providing the water, not the EPA. HiPointDem Jul 2012 #37

At the end of the day, the EPA (not just the DEP) is on record that Dimock's water is safe to drink badtoworse Aug 2012 #38

Probably a hand slap like BP Politicalboi Jul 2012 #31

Where are the wingnut defenders of private property? Odin2005 Jul 2012 #17

Corporations are people my friend! Liberal_in_LA Jul 2012 #19

All my life, I have said that no rights were sacred. malthaussen Jul 2012 #25

Post removed Post removed Jul 2012 #30

" You People Are Victums Of Your Own Ignorance"???...I guess so.... lostnote12 Jul 2012 #33