Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FirstLight

(15,771 posts)

2. *snort* "top criminal"

Reply to RandomAccess (Reply #1)

Tue May 1, 2018, 04:34 PM

May 2018

...and the long line of succession will also no doubt be indicted as well. I wonder when the SHTF how many dominoes will actually fall, either by indictment or resignation in disgrace?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rosenstein just implied Trump could be indicted. [View all] OliverQ May 2018 OP

Personally, I think the "no indictment" guideline RandomAccess May 2018 #1

*snort* "top criminal" FirstLight May 2018 #2

I'm real worried not nearly enough -- as in -- no Pence RandomAccess May 2018 #3

Your concern is noted. Pence is an ass ollie10 May 2018 #6

I think I wasn't clear RandomAccess May 2018 #7

OK. I agree. Pence is probably in it into his ears ollie10 May 2018 #9

+1 RandomAccess May 2018 #14

I hate Pence, but he's only awful in the usual rightwing way. He's not Svengali. pnwmom May 2018 #10

Exactly. Pence is boring. forgotmylogin May 2018 #21

I agree, and in 2020, I don't think he would stand a chance Rorey May 2018 #27

AGREE here!! Also hope it doesn't stop there!! Lots of bluestarone May 2018 #11

+1 RandomAccess May 2018 #13

I was thinking about that this morning in fact. BigmanPigman May 2018 #15

It's also possible that Mueller has a sealed indictment with Pence's name on it. Eyeball_Kid May 2018 #16

That's what I pray -- but I would still love a little reassurance RandomAccess May 2018 #17

Yup. The point was to prevent potus from being buried with legalities, impeding the ability to do th lindysalsagal May 2018 #12

sure, there have been opinions that sitting presidents can't be indicted NewJeffCT May 2018 #4

So right on that! triron May 2018 #20

If he can't be indicted duforsure May 2018 #5

I believe I agree with you. I realize that Ilsa May 2018 #22

very interesting to make a distinction between a past "opinion" and the "current situation" unblock May 2018 #8

Is This The First Case Under The Special Counsel Law? DallasNE May 2018 #18

He most certainly did. And he did it intentionally. triron May 2018 #19

If a President can be subpoenaed, why not indicted? paleotn May 2018 #23

I assume based on the fact that impeachment and trial in the Senate is listed as the OliverQ May 2018 #24

I'm not sure if the SCOTUS rulling states impeachment as the only remedy... paleotn May 2018 #25

There is no bottle of champagne big enough if that day comes Eliot Rosewater May 2018 #26

Yes. Trump can be indicted because as Rosenstein underthematrix May 2018 #28

knr triron May 2018 #29

kick for visibility triron May 2018 #30

Good god; the only thing more dangerous than a President Trump HenryWallace May 2018 #31