General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: hey, guess what! turns out, michelle wolf is a woman! [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)You are perfectly free - despite your claims of being "silenced" - to simply not engage in a discussion. A discussion takes two, does it not? Yet you seem to be flummoxed by that, and have referred to it as being "supressed."
What issues do you have with someone replying to your posts, and pointing out where they see contradictions from previous posts, insults, mansplaining, talking about women as though being a "working mom" in a high profile job of lying for a public figure requires that men step in when "mean lady comedians" mention makeup, if indeed those opinions are based in fact?
That doesn't really indicate an openness to listening, but rather enjoying simply lecturing to the vast majority of progressives here on DU that they simply don't understand how Wolf (who you keep insisting that "no one ever heard of before this, and is simply in this for the MONEY MONEY MONEY!!!i could possibly be a "skilled" comedian (despite the fact that she is on the Daily Show, and has earned her own show somehow despite you erroneously, and continually claime "no one ever heard of her before this" ) and anyone who disagrees with you CLEARLY doesn't understand that MLK would disapprove because you do (your words) ...
Like I would say to Sarah three names, who you think needs "support" from men to do her damn job, "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen."
And why don't you tell me what you think we "disagree" on. Your post had several insults and implied slams - I just want to be clear on which ones you were trying to shiv with. If you have the courage to own your statements, that is.
Is that clearer?