Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: MSNBC reporting Jay Sekulow compiled the list of 49 questions. [View all]not fooled
(6,680 posts)55. One theory
is that the moron's camp is trying to de-emphasize the financial aspects of his crimes. So, they selected which questions to leak and deliberately omitted other questions pertaining to money laundering, his business dealings, etc. which Mueller is certainly going to ask.
I heard this posited by an analyst on MSNBC. Sorry, can't remember the guy's name for attribution.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I agree yellow is too positive to assign as his crayon color. Red like his MAGA caps
lunasun
May 2018
#51
I'm thinking Michael Cohen after Trump-endorsed Nat Enq hit piece against him. But I don't see path.
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2018
#32
Washington Post story reports that Sekulow compiled 49 questions and Trump fumed
wishstar
May 2018
#19
It is a limited list. I thought that the omission of certain topics was rather strange.
Sophia4
May 2018
#25
Yes - still a lot of "unknowns" in all of this. And leaked by someone in Trump's
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2018
#56
Yes. I think they are practicing and maybe even corroborating Trump's story with
Sophia4
May 2018
#58
Great obervation ! Shit - unless you have 24/7 time to piece all this
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2018
#60
I just think it very odd that Hicks spoke to -- was it Mueller's investigation --
Sophia4
May 2018
#61
Yes. Totally more to the story. And, one of those things that means something
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2018
#62
To answer your question, I don't know. I'm just wondering what happened to her.
Sophia4
May 2018
#64
Doesn't matter. Tomorrow, most Americans will still believe that the Democrats leaked the
Oneironaut
May 2018
#34
Many folks here said that when trump blasted the "leak", that meant he was involved. nt
7962
May 2018
#35
45's critique of the "leak" prooves they don't tell him what's going on: They leaked it.
lindysalsagal
May 2018
#50
Not to say 'I told ya so', but pretty sure I was the first to mention where Trump was going w/this
mr_lebowski
May 2018
#53