Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spooky3

(38,276 posts)
42. I personally do not believe that being born within 20 (or even 10) years of another person
Mon May 7, 2018, 08:47 PM
May 2018

necessarily connects you or makes you more similar than you are to someone else with whom you may share some connection.

There is not a lot of good research on generational behavior, though there is a lot of speculating about it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

My wife and I are 66, and we are not grandparents DFW May 2018 #1
Congratulations, Grampa! MineralMan May 2018 #2
Congrats, DFW! nt spooky3 May 2018 #3
Congratulations! GWC58 May 2018 #51
My brother is also an "older dad" Freddie May 2018 #77
How lovely for you guys! In a perfect world, we'd all have Hortensis May 2018 #53
Congratulations. Enjoy the beauty of it all. oasis May 2018 #65
Well, I'm Gen X, just barely... Adrahil May 2018 #70
Same here, but just a few years younger. My little ones Ilsa May 2018 #93
My wife and I were 31 when we had our first, 33 when we had our second DFW May 2018 #95
I had my kids in my late 30s, early 40s. ;-) nt Ilsa May 2018 #96
I never liked qualifying anyone born in 1964 as "baby boomers". BlueStater May 2018 #4
Well, that's not my definition, but it is THE definition. MineralMan May 2018 #6
Not necessarily. JenniferJuniper May 2018 #22
I've never seen that breakdown. And since 1940 was 6 years away from the end of WWII, children born spooky3 May 2018 #39
Yes, in recent years there has been some shifting JenniferJuniper May 2018 #41
I personally do not believe that being born within 20 (or even 10) years of another person spooky3 May 2018 #42
Specifically, no. Broadly? Absolutely. JenniferJuniper May 2018 #45
Please provide references to peer-reviewed published academic research spooky3 May 2018 #46
Oh, please. JenniferJuniper May 2018 #47
Or declining to do all that work you can and would do Hortensis May 2018 #54
I was born in 1964 and am NOT a baby boomer janterry May 2018 #76
If it shifts again I may end up a Millennial kcr May 2018 #64
The Boomer generation was so big TexasBushwhacker May 2018 #23
So true. nt Kahuna7 May 2018 #24
I agree. llmart May 2018 #44
The titles and time frames that they give these groups is always off. BigmanPigman May 2018 #5
I'm not arguing. That's the established definition. MineralMan May 2018 #8
Yeah, the age groups are strangely named and dated. BigmanPigman May 2018 #19
If you look at a chart of the number of births during that period BumRushDaShow May 2018 #31
45 - 57ish zipplewrath May 2018 #79
I.e., the "Yuppies" BumRushDaShow May 2018 #83
Older sibilings. zipplewrath May 2018 #88
Yup. BumRushDaShow May 2018 #89
Precisely misanthrope May 2018 #18
I don't mean to quibble, but without seeing Census or similar data, and relying spooky3 May 2018 #7
The OP is blaming everyone but boomers for helicopter parenting crazycatlady May 2018 #12
Ah. Thanks for the explanation. n/t spooky3 May 2018 #14
Born in 1949..my boys were "free range boys" SoCalDem May 2018 #62
My wife and I are at the back end of the EXPANDED Boomer range, 1962 and 1964 rufus dog May 2018 #37
Me, too janterry May 2018 #82
A wonderful niece graduates college this week, 22. Parents b. 1952, boomers. appalachiablue May 2018 #55
I blockwalk and I can't count on anyone under 65 to be home before 5:30 pm LeftInTX May 2018 #9
Balanced budget enid602 May 2018 #10
Born in 1946. Retiring at end of this month. skip fox May 2018 #11
Congratulations! AwakeAtLast May 2018 #57
I'm 62 and not retired TrogL May 2018 #13
Well, I was born in 1950, so I'm definitely a boomer The_jackalope May 2018 #15
I'm a mid-Boomer ('55) Maeve May 2018 #16
I know grandparents born after 1964 misanthrope May 2018 #17
When I was 20 crazycatlady May 2018 #29
Don't assume. I'm a boomer. I'm 54, turning 55 next month. Borchkins May 2018 #20
You can get Medicare at 65. It's Social Security that has the age 67 rule. n/t spooky3 May 2018 #38
I'm 55, and my two sons are 9, in third grade. Crunchy Frog May 2018 #59
Born in the early 60's and I don't identify as a boomer at all JenniferJuniper May 2018 #21
Is there someone arguing that baby boomers are still having children? treestar May 2018 #25
LOL missingthebigdog May 2018 #35
Boomer Donald Trump has a middle school aged kid crazycatlady May 2018 #40
Men can HockeyMom May 2018 #86
There is so much gray area on the fringes of generations. GreenEyedLefty May 2018 #26
I was born in 56, wife in 52 benld74 May 2018 #27
Actually 54 these days would more likely be parents to teens JI7 May 2018 #28
When I think of a boomer, I imagine someone who least came of age John Fante May 2018 #30
There is a 9 year gap between my sister and me ProudLib72 May 2018 #32
I'm 54 and have a 9 year old! CottonBear May 2018 #33
That's unusual, statistically, though. MineralMan May 2018 #36
People are having kids later kcr May 2018 #66
As I said, most people with children that age are Generation X-ers. MineralMan May 2018 #67
Well, that's not what you said. You said we need to do our math. kcr May 2018 #69
Ha! Me too, except there's two of them. Crunchy Frog May 2018 #60
Wow! Lucky you! Twice the fun! CottonBear May 2018 #61
I'm baby boomer and a parent of college student as well as a grandparent of a high school student Fresh_Start May 2018 #34
uuuh...I'm single and born in 62, I still want kids but thanks for the generalization Demonaut May 2018 #43
Are you just throwing all this out there for discussion... llmart May 2018 #48
Demographic definitions kurtcagle May 2018 #49
The generation after millennials is Gen Z crazycatlady May 2018 #91
Strauss and Howe place the Boomer generation PoindexterOglethorpe May 2018 #50
Thanks, I'll have to read it.. Stellar May 2018 #63
You are. PoindexterOglethorpe May 2018 #71
Agree, why better to think of generations radius777 May 2018 #73
Generation jones? PoindexterOglethorpe May 2018 #90
Generation Jones are later Boomers/early Xers. radius777 May 2018 #92
Thank you for the clarification. PoindexterOglethorpe May 2018 #94
Just got back from another evening of blockwalking LeftInTX May 2018 #52
So what is the point MM? Blue_true May 2018 #56
I don't propose any strategies. MineralMan May 2018 #68
I did not get the objective of your post. Maybe I missed something. nt Blue_true May 2018 #72
Imma a combo baby boomer/genxer ismnotwasm May 2018 #58
Actually they were born in 59 Trumpocalypse May 2018 #74
Nah Utah Grizzlee May 2018 #75
I'm thinking there should be 2 kinds of Boomers Freddie May 2018 #78
absolutely zipplewrath May 2018 #81
Born in 2nd half of 64, I claim GenX as mine. eShirl May 2018 #80
My Mom was 7 years old at the end of WWII, but being a 1964 birth, bullwinkle428 May 2018 #84
My SIL born in 1946 had a daughter born in 1964 HockeyMom May 2018 #85
I fit your example born in 56 marlakay May 2018 #87
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Last Baby Boomers wer...»Reply #42