Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. And that audit list would be of keen interest...
Thu May 17, 2018, 11:03 AM
May 2018

...to an investigator looking for evidence of a coverup.

If someone who is otherwise authorized to access the database for legitimate purposes is going off on their own personal adventure, they could end up interfering with a legitimate investigation.

The notion that all "authorized users" can be trusted flew out the window with former DU heroes like Snowden and Manning.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It sounds to me like what happened after Obama's SSN was disclosed jberryhill May 2018 #1
Right - absolutely likely those missing SARS were restricted/hidden on purpose. It Laura PourMeADrink May 2018 #4
And that audit list would be of keen interest... jberryhill May 2018 #9
And how did he know how many SARS should even be there? nt B2G May 2018 #2
Think the other two were referenced on the one they got. I really hate to Laura PourMeADrink May 2018 #5
What I don't understand is why he went to Avenatti B2G May 2018 #10
In order to have Avenatti tip off potential suspects of the criminal investigation jberryhill May 2018 #11
Why would he want to do that? nt B2G May 2018 #12
Who is the "he" in that question? jberryhill May 2018 #16
The SAR released refers to other SARs apparently. This doesn't compare to the SSN thing. bitterross May 2018 #3
I think the SSN example just shows that where there is curiosity and access to Laura PourMeADrink May 2018 #6
I believe you missed the point entirely jberryhill May 2018 #7
Wonder if other banks have access to the SAR d-base - probably not. But if I Laura PourMeADrink May 2018 #13
Could be some mid-level employee at the bank? kentuck May 2018 #8
Sure it could. Don't believe it was ever stated exactly where the info came from that Laura PourMeADrink May 2018 #14
"We are getting nowhere it seems in the public sector arena" jberryhill May 2018 #15
Most likely - someone interfering with a criminal investigation jberryhill May 2018 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More brainstorming about ...»Reply #9