Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(52,208 posts)

17. Indeed it would.

Fri May 18, 2018, 02:14 PM

May 2018

Clinton was a workaholic and he couldn't get out of a civil trial on that argument.

It would be very inconsistent to let Donnie off the hook.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Question: Is there any difference between state laws and federal laws pertaining to [View all] bluestarone May 2018 OP

A court might delay state action until presidency over Cicada May 2018 #1

Yes, bugliosi said feds we're wrong not to delay Cicada May 2018 #10

i don't think that will happen. unblock May 2018 #11

AGREE here! bluestarone May 2018 #13

people forget that the court has to look beyond the particular case. unblock May 2018 #15

Would him playing golf almost every weekend come into play? bluestarone May 2018 #16

Indeed it would. unblock May 2018 #17

a few differences: unblock May 2018 #2

arresting a president seems hardly necessary. unblock May 2018 #5

"if anyone on the planet can be released on their own recognizance" PoliticAverse May 2018 #6

My answer to your question about the states. Jim Lane May 2018 #12

Excellent point here!!!! TY bluestarone May 2018 #14

TY all for your answers here! bluestarone May 2018 #9