Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Name recognition. nt stevenleser May 2018 #1
That's an insult to the people of VT... Dennis Donovan May 2018 #3
We all know that name recognition doesn't guarantee a win. Autumn May 2018 #4
+1 Uncle Joe May 2018 #6
Fo sho!! InAbLuEsTaTe May 2018 #34
Post removed Post removed May 2018 #8
Really? So everytime people said the reason Hillary was doing so well was name recognition they were stevenleser May 2018 #11
Bernie didn't have name recognition when he started, the people of Vermont Uncle Joe May 2018 #12
That bit of situational ethics is unconvincing. stevenleser May 2018 #13
I remember a relative unknown who gave a speech in 2004 and 4 years later Autumn May 2018 #14
Yes he did despite Trump and other Republican assertions that he Uncle Joe May 2018 #15
This is what Republicans and others have always done to people like Obama, Hillary and Bernie. Autumn May 2018 #20
In other words, the attempt by some here to reduce Hillary's support to "Name Recognition" was wrong stevenleser May 2018 #16
Yes, and that goes for anyone attempting to reduce Bernie's support to Autumn May 2018 #19
On that we agree. I hoped I could get at least some who did that to recognize it was wrong and to stevenleser May 2018 #21
How does it make me feel? I feel sorry for anyone who thinks that Bernie, and our other leaders Autumn May 2018 #24
I believe that name recognition can be an advantage especially to an uneducated public Uncle Joe May 2018 #25
Yes it can be an advantage. But people who have won election after election by their Autumn May 2018 #26
I agree and it's good to see you as well Autumn Uncle Joe May 2018 #42
I too make that allegation LanternWaste May 2018 #55
Please elaborate LanternWaste Uncle Joe May 2018 #56
Who did that? Reduced her support to name recognition? Obviously, that contributed to some extent... InAbLuEsTaTe May 2018 #36
The only NAMES I am interested in have D's after them. Eliot Rosewater May 2018 #51
When I mention Secretary Clinton in that context, you might have a point... Dennis Donovan May 2018 #17
My point is not dependent on anything you said. nt stevenleser May 2018 #18
Then your point is pointless... Dennis Donovan May 2018 #22
Nope, it just went over your head. nt stevenleser May 2018 #23
Yes, attributing someone's success merely to name recognition is insulitng. thesquanderer May 2018 #29
Yep, worked for Hilary. aidbo May 2018 #30
Lots of Senators have tremendous name recognition among their constituents. thesquanderer May 2018 #31
Yes, he represents his Vermont constituent demographic well...nt SidDithers May 2018 #2
That's precisely correct. NurseJackie May 2018 #5
"Reverend William Barber Is Reviving MLK's Poor People's Campaign. He Got Arrested the First Day" Uncle Joe May 2018 #9
Do you feel the same about Sen. Leahy? RhodeIslandOne May 2018 #35
Right now, I have no opinion about him one way or the other. Why is this even important or relevant? NurseJackie May 2018 #37
No opinion? RhodeIslandOne May 2018 #39
Ask me again in 2022. NurseJackie May 2018 #41
I guess it's more exciting to live in a "diverse" state RhodeIslandOne May 2018 #44
Sorry, I wouldn't know about that. Besides... NurseJackie May 2018 #45
Yes. But the difference is that Leahy doesn't try to position some kind of civil rights icon EffieBlack May 2018 #65
I wouldn't expect any differently. tammywammy May 2018 #7
I agree tammywammy Uncle Joe May 2018 #10
"He must be doing something right..." brooklynite May 2018 #27
Except of course he is Not A Democrat shanny May 2018 #32
As an Independent. RhodeIslandOne May 2018 #40
Amy Klobuchar has the support of the majority of Minnesotans even though both pnwmom May 2018 #28
who will the democrats run against him. Sanders is not a democrat. we need one of msongs May 2018 #33
Yes we do. I prefer Democrats, too. NurseJackie May 2018 #43
K&R mvd May 2018 #38
Kickie poo for the night crowd Uncle Joe May 2018 #46
Well, he did remove any competition by running WhiteTara May 2018 #47
Any Democrat or Republican can still be primaried n/t Uncle Joe May 2018 #48
Anyone can compete against him in the Democratic primary. Jim Lane May 2018 #49
No, that's really not the way it works. WhiteTara May 2018 #50
Just remember that success, excellence, etc. wasn't enough to stop Bernie Blue_Tires May 2018 #52
Oh Lordy. Hassin Bin Sober May 2018 #53
Bernie was never angry with President Obama, he cited differences Uncle Joe May 2018 #54
No matter how he likes to spin it, Blue_Tires May 2018 #60
Bernie is about the issues first, last and in the middle no matter the time of his political career Uncle Joe May 2018 #61
I'm looking deeds, not words... Blue_Tires May 2018 #64
Bernie? Uncle Joe May 2018 #67
But Bernie isn't a Dem, remember? Blue_Tires May 2018 #69
Democrat or Independent they all or virtually all agreed on this, Uncle Joe May 2018 #70
Oh snap... disillusioned73 May 2018 #57
Great to hear. We need his voice more than ever at this time. jalan48 May 2018 #58
I totally agree jalan Uncle Joe May 2018 #59
Thanks for the post Uncle Joe. jalan48 May 2018 #71
Thanks Uncle, saidsimplesimon May 2018 #62
Thank you saidsimplesimon Uncle Joe May 2018 #63
Thank you Uncle Joe for the article Devil Child May 2018 #66
Thank you Devil Child Uncle Joe May 2018 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As Midterms Approach, Ber...»Reply #6