Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(26,582 posts)

9. It would apply only to public officials.

Wed May 23, 2018, 12:40 PM

May 2018

Not private individuals.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal judge rules Trump blocking people on Twitter is unconstitutional [View all] bigtree May 2018 OP

Good dalton99a May 2018 #1

Darn, yes! It just affects blocks on viewing. Hortensis May 2018 #5

Oh, I hope you're right and the 1 initial analysis I read Hortensis May 2018 #20

He will keep right on doing it with no repercussions Takket May 2018 #3

After all, elleng May 2018 #4

Is the same true for all posters? B2G May 2018 #6

It would apply only to public officials. tammywammy May 2018 #9

My guess is that it would be more narrowly interpreted mythology May 2018 #12

Agreed. tammywammy May 2018 #14

Weird manor321 May 2018 #7

He was also blocking people from responding. tammywammy May 2018 #10

Actually if blocked, while logged in, users couldn't see the tweets mythology May 2018 #13

LOL Lucinda May 2018 #15

Thank you, District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald! Cha May 2018 #22