Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why would they let that tidbit of info out? Wouldn't it serve better to keep it quiet? n/t woodsprite May 2018 #1
I think it's pundit guesswork C_U_L8R May 2018 #3
yep all it is is guesswork. in a way letting it out may be certainot May 2018 #50
Look at it as though both sides have nukes Wednesdays May 2018 #6
As a warning. Demsrule86 May 2018 #24
Why announce it? Doesn't sound as if it's coming out of Mueller's office RestoreAmerica2020 May 2018 #39
I hope that this is accurate Gothmog May 2018 #2
Hope so. The problem I can't get out of my head is what happens Eliot Rosewater May 2018 #4
sixty million very dumb, mean, ARMED people 0rganism May 2018 #7
Some are very dangerous and may kill, but almost all are talk and no action. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2018 #10
"almost all" is almost reassuring: 1% of sixty million is a mere 600000 dangerous psychopaths 0rganism May 2018 #14
That's okay. I have seven.....:) Crappy shot though. dameatball May 2018 #20
A smaller percentage own most of the guns. Most of his supporters that have guns, probably just brewens May 2018 #28
they will have to be reminded that we are a democracy that exists due to rule of law. spanone May 2018 #29
That would be a problem if they were the only ones who are armed. Mr.Bill May 2018 #46
Or police tazkcmo May 2018 #49
As soon as one of them so much as pointed a gun at the Police or Military, Mr.Bill May 2018 #53
You're assuming TheRealNorth May 2018 #57
The police and/or military is not going to join a movement to Mr.Bill May 2018 #58
Yep. I see it all the time. GulfCoast66 May 2018 #51
Think different thoughts vlyons May 2018 #15
LOve it Eliot Rosewater May 2018 #17
+1 Manifest by envisioning. Not blind to risks, but keeps eyes on the prize. No mysticism involved. Bernardo de La Paz May 2018 #21
The line between mysticism and reality is blurry. MGKrebs May 2018 #35
Love it! fierywoman May 2018 #23
It will not end well Perseus May 2018 #27
They've already decided lunatica May 2018 #32
That's exactly right, they won't do shit. Ligyron May 2018 #36
In Wisconsin TheRealNorth May 2018 #67
Pure intimindation with no follow through. Ligyron May 2018 #68
better than the cilla4progress May 2018 #37
If they fight us, we fight back. Period. ecstatic May 2018 #63
Fired Insurance DUgosh May 2018 #5
Recommended. H2O Man May 2018 #8
Looking forward coeur_de_lion May 2018 #61
Yes. H2O Man May 2018 #64
thrilled to hear it coeur_de_lion May 2018 #65
Good news. I've suspected he would and posted my thoughts a few months ago. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2018 #9
Here's a link with a fuller explanation. Qutzupalotl May 2018 #11
Born-To-Run-The-Numbers has said this as well. DinahMoeHum May 2018 #16
Somewhat misleading statement about the dismissal of an indictment onenote May 2018 #30
Excellent info - thanks for that! lagomorph777 May 2018 #34
Excellent article. I think that Mueller would do it if only to preserve the rule of law against a Demsrule86 May 2018 #42
👏 Duppers May 2018 #60
Dr. Strangelove lame54 May 2018 #12
It makes sense bucolic_frolic May 2018 #13
But if the info networks (internet/radio/tv) are all shut down or put into full propaganda mode erronis May 2018 #18
At that point TheRealNorth May 2018 #59
I hope Hayes' source is correct NewJeffCT May 2018 #19
Unsourced speculation that almost certainly is wrong onenote May 2018 #22
But educated guesses -- and speculation very much work that way RandomAccess May 2018 #38
See Post #30 onenote May 2018 #41
I read your comment as a GENERAL statement, not RandomAccess May 2018 #48
Louise Mensch predicted this a year ago. triron May 2018 #25
Then it's probably bullshit. The Velveteen Ocelot May 2018 #52
Then it is correct. Thanks to the remarkable LM & her Team Patriot. Wwcd May 2018 #54
So explain how this works. onenote May 2018 #55
OneNote, this is very confusing - perhaps you can expand a bit. KY_EnviroGuy May 2018 #72
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2018 #26
Not a fact... speculation by the guest zaj May 2018 #31
Holy shit. That is the exact term I have using to predict that for a year now! lagomorph777 May 2018 #33
That sounds somewhat like an attempt to make this partisan.... Chakaconcarne May 2018 #40
It is fine to discuss it... I believe no grand jury in the world would fail to indict Trump for his Demsrule86 May 2018 #43
It is partisan...but the GOP made it so by refusing to reign in the president. Demsrule86 May 2018 #44
What's stopping them now? ananda May 2018 #45
What fake news internet BS. former9thward May 2018 #47
I hope so. (n/t) Iggo May 2018 #56
I hope so, and I hope that despite what Ghouliani said, drump ecstatic May 2018 #62
Mueller has a dead man switch. If they start firing people they'll press Send on pile of indictments gristy May 2018 #66
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2018 #69
This was discussed on Morning Joe, but superficially. Ilsa May 2018 #70
Seems to me if there were indictments ready to go, he'd push the switch now. ??? Honeycombe8 May 2018 #71
I know Mueller is smart zentrum May 2018 #73
Yep....I read a couple of months ago Upthevibe May 2018 #74
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mueller has a dead man sw...»Reply #1