Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What makes Barack Obama such a great President? [View all]hfojvt
(37,573 posts)28. suppose the fire chief, instead of putting out the fire
decides to "compromise" with the arson league to let just 9/10ths of the town burn. And then promotes arson as a plan to create housing instead of promoting firefighting. Of course the arson league is in control of the House, but does the Chief have to propose an arson plan instead of espousing the benefits of fire fighting?
Could the fire chief be blamed then? Or were people just expecting him to walk on water?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bank of America still exists. Some people find that difficult to accept. n/t
banned from Kos
Jan 2012
#9
I guess I could have just said "You're full of shit" but I wanted to be polite.
MjolnirTime
Jan 2012
#40
Badly misinformed... full of shit... neither statement is very intelligent or profound. n/t
cherokeeprogressive
Jan 2012
#62
you no doubt know this but to really destroy capitalism you have to start with the financial sector
banned from Kos
Jan 2012
#15
Guess what. Capitalism destroyed itself, in 2008, and was rescued. It will destroy itself again.
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#59
ok - the nine big banks repaid TARP (Pro Publica) so the big holdouts are the GSEs.
banned from Kos
Jan 2012
#50
The government would have needed to seize nothing, just watch the banksters file for bankruptcy...
JackRiddler
Jan 2012
#58
Krugman and Stiglitz don't have to deal with any political consequences.
banned from Kos
Jan 2012
#67
Fine analogy, except that the treasurer in this instance is the one defunding the chief.
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#48
Yet the town founding papers say that no new spending can be done except through the elected...
joshcryer
Jan 2012
#54
Health Care Reform, the formation of a Consumer Protection Bureau, helping homeowners
mzmolly
Jan 2012
#26
Running on "Bush's policies are fucked" & then continuing those policies isn't "great"
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2012
#46