Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son, RFK Jr., doesn't believe Sirhan acted alone (WAPO) [View all]Maeve
(43,457 posts)9. More than that, I'd want more on the ballistics
If the bullets and the gun don't match....and there is some question.
People can be wrong, memories can fade or alter. But bullets are more objective.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son, RFK Jr., doesn't believe Sirhan acted alone (WAPO) [View all]
hlthe2b
May 2018
OP
Read the article. It is Schrade that I find compelling. This has nothing to do with vaccines.
hlthe2b
May 2018
#4
This is an article from the Guardian ten years ago and RFK jr. isn't part of it.
pnwmom
May 2018
#84
Give me a break - JFK Jr. is a great environmental lawyer and activist
womanofthehills
May 2018
#105
If you don't read the article you won't know what his criticisms are of the earlier investigation.
pnwmom
May 2018
#59
Well, I did read the article [edit: before my initial response, that is], and it reads like
RockRaven
May 2018
#68
When Schrade came face to face with Sirhan at parole hearing, he argued Schrade was not K's killer
womanofthehills
May 2018
#106
He seems to have evolved a little bit from earlier stances that were clearly more anti-vax
hlthe2b
May 2018
#96
Hello.... you can thank him for helping take mercury out of most of our vaccines
womanofthehills
May 2018
#100
He's saying there was a second shooter. In that crowded space, I think it's possible. n/t
pnwmom
May 2018
#24
If it was such a mob scene, how does anyone know Sirhan didn't get that close
EffieBlack
May 2018
#14
Also, both RFK Jr. & Schrade do not believe Sirhan killed Kennedy after meeting Sirhan in person
womanofthehills
May 2018
#107
Regardless what Bugliosi said during the trial, the court did NOT find there was a conspiracy
EffieBlack
May 2018
#111
Pardon my interjection, but he certainly is (a class act)... I only know Bugliosi's work
hlthe2b
May 2018
#123
It has come up... Particularly the ballistics and the failure to keep some of the evidence
hlthe2b
May 2018
#11
It has -- and more. Like audio recordings, for example. But it keeps getting dismissed,
pnwmom
May 2018
#66
Sometimes we just can't understand the crazy acts of crazy people unless we're crazy too
struggle4progress
May 2018
#17
This has nothing to do with Sirhan's guilt--clearly established, but a second shooter. n/t
hlthe2b
May 2018
#18
Yes -- I keep looking for an explanation for that, and all I find are people dismissing it
pnwmom
May 2018
#89
Not true. One of the men who was shot that day is the biggest proponent of the 2nd shooter theory
pnwmom
May 2018
#58
Wasn't there an effort to prevent those diaries being presented as evidence?
madamesilverspurs
May 2018
#37
There is ZERO evidence of a second shooter. There are a gazillion conspiracy theories though.
tonyt53
May 2018
#101
What do you mean by "there was no such document"? And the Guardian is not a tabloid.
pnwmom
May 2018
#113
They caught the guy at the time...give me a break from all these conspiracy theories.
Demsrule86
May 2018
#20
No one is saying Sirhan wasn't guilty. The issue is if there was a second shooter. READ the article
hlthe2b
May 2018
#21
Could RFK simply have turned his head, which would make shots from front appear to be from behind?
Liberty Belle
May 2018
#33
RFK's widow, brother, sisters, and the rest of his children all believed/believe Sirhan acted alone
EffieBlack
May 2018
#71
Plenty more other people who were also there - and who weren't distracted by being shot -
EffieBlack
May 2018
#79
I really don't know what to believe. Recently a program aired about Sirhan being ''programmed''.
YOHABLO
May 2018
#43
If there were two shooters that would of been very easily discerned by the eyewitnesses
Kirk Lover
May 2018
#73
I really don't know what to believe. Recently a program aired about Sirhan being ''programmed''.
YOHABLO
May 2018
#44
I don't care if it comes from the WP, it is still bullshit. Mr. anti-vaxer has seen the evidence
still_one
May 2018
#49
The article does not say Sirhan was not guilty. You missed the point or did not read the article
hlthe2b
May 2018
#50
There is actually some substantial evidence for the 2nd shooter theory, which is what
pnwmom
May 2018
#56
Yes... this is the article title, but should have been "RFK doesn't believe Sirhan acted alone" OR
hlthe2b
May 2018
#52
No, it might be a simple mistake, borne out of the desire to get the matter over with.
pnwmom
May 2018
#90