General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jim Carrey tears in to dems [View all]Me.
(35,454 posts)This is a guaranteed drink for Debate Night Bingo. Sanderss rejection of super PACs has become such a core part of his campaign that his supporters worked it into their chant: We dont need a Super PAC, Bernie Sanders has our back.Yet there are some important distinctions glossed over in this claim, which obscures the fact that Sanders has benefited from outside groups, including a super PAC that has spent more than $1 million campaigning for him. Lets check it out
.
Most presidential candidates have tacitly sanctioned super PACs that support them and act as extensions of their official campaigns. They often are run by the candidates former staffers or top allies, and the candidates help raise money for these super PACs. For example, Jeb Bushs allies run a super PAC and nonprofit called Right to Rise. Hillary Clintons super PACs, Priorities USA Action and Correct the Record, are run by her top allies. Such super PACs have been criticized for blurring the line between coordination and non-coordination. (Check out this helpful graphic by The Washington Post and the Center for Responsive Politics.)
Technically, there is no super PAC sanctioned by Sanders in the same way that other candidates have. There have been three unaffiliated ones. Billionaires for Bernie has not raised any money. Collective Actions PAC raised just $443. Sanders has worked to disassociate himself from these groups, PolitiFact found.
The third has gotten the most attention: a super PAC financed by the nurses union. The National Nurses United for Patient Protection has spent nearly $1.2 million as of February 2016 in support of Sanders, including on mailers and a bus tour through several key early primary states.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/02/11/sanderss-claim-that-he-does-not-have-a-super-pac/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0000b15da80c
On Thursday, Sanders won the support of Communications Workers of America, another major labor union. At an event announcing the endorsement, a similar tension was on display. Sanders denounced big money in politics, but CWA president Chris Shelton indicated the union is likely to use its super PAC to support his campaign. We will respect Bernies wishes, but we will use all legal and possible resources to get him elected, Candice Johnson, a spokesperson for the union said. We do have a super PAC, but its a super PAC of a union of 700,000 working people, not a couple of billionaires. Thats a big difference.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/12/bernie-sanders-super-pac/420930/
It is an unusual arrangement: Instead of billionaire donors looking to fund television ads, Sanders campaign staffers have formed a dissenting splinter group in the northernmost state and campaign on the ground for the Alaska caucus. From a drab shopping mall storefront, they want to take on Clintons powerful alliance on the Acela corridor.
The group also exists in murky legal territory, as federal election law requires a cooling-off period that prevents a candidates staff from leaving the campaign and doing certain kinds of work for a supporting super PAC within 120 days. Americas Youth PAC disputes it is doing anything illegal, but several independent campaign finance experts said it was pressing the boundaries of election law.
http://time.com/4261350/bernie-sanders-super-pac-alaska-millenials/