Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
32. The Grammar Nazi strikes again!
Sun Jun 3, 2018, 11:21 AM
Jun 2018

From someone who majored in journalism:

1. In American English, periods and commas always belong inside quotation marks, e.g., between the "dumb" and the "bright." (While it isn't firmly established whether a comma should follow e.g. and i.e., both the Chicago Manual of Style and the AP Stylebook say that both abbreviations are followed by a comma.)

2. A question mark or exclamation point goes inside the quotation marks if it refers to the quoted statement: He asked, "What's going on?" Place the punctuation outside the closing quotation marks if the punctuation applies to the whole sentence: Did Bob say,"I want to see 'The Avengers'"?

3. An ellipsis (...) is used to indicate omitted words. The em dash can be used in place of a colon when you want to emphasize the conclusion of your sentence. The only time you would put an em dash at the end of a sentence is to show someone’s words are being cut off for whatever reason. “’We can’t keep this up any—’ Kyle’s voice caught as he noticed his boss turn the corner.”

4. "grabing" is not a word, and gets picked up by the spell check.

5. Sometimes a word passes through the spell checker but is the wrong word, e.g., "us" for "is."

6. If it is used in a the middle of a sentence, etc. is set off by commas; if used at the end the word's period is sufficient.

source: Grammar Girl and Daily Writing Tips.

I doubt Trump followers even know who Rep. Schiff is, let alone care about his lexicon and use of grammar.

When you go to law school, as I did, the way you express yourself changes. You find yourself expanding your vocabulary, but not always for the better. For example, I never used "notwithstanding" before law school. My favorite story concerns an attorney husband arguing with his lawyer wife. "You don't have standing to bring that up!" said the husband.

I have a friend who is working on her doctorate. She said her instructors told her that at some point a PhD can't hold a conversation with a bowler.

For a discussion about why good grammar is important, see Daily Grammar's discussion of the topic.

Having said all that, I agree that Schiff could have expressed himself differently. Since the Tweet is already out there, however, the issue is moot.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The law requires that someone enforce it. woodsprite Jun 2018 #1
Enforcement would require either Congress or a prosecutor. Congress is not going to. 3Hotdogs Jun 2018 #3
The enforcer is the courts and THEN LE officers. pangaia Jun 2018 #17
I'm all for putting it to the test. ooky Jun 2018 #26
An enforcer still should be following the law. PoindexterOglethorpe Jun 2018 #14
The Republicans are in last stages of a major bloodless coup. olegramps Jun 2018 #28
Stay on him Adam. You are kicking serious ass. oasis Jun 2018 #2
"Rendering moot?"??? Try "trashing the Constitution." DemocracyMouse Jun 2018 #4
There is nothing wrong with his writing. GoCubsGo Jun 2018 #5
"Talk in terms a toddler can understand?" pangaia Jun 2018 #19
Just because Cheeto has the vocabulary of a 5-year old, we should not expect OldHippieChick Jun 2018 #6
I'm talking about grabbing everyone's interest. DemocracyMouse Jun 2018 #12
Fix your grabing tavernier Jun 2018 #13
See post #8 below as well OldHippieChick Jun 2018 #15
The Grammar Nazi strikes again! LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jun 2018 #32
Thanks for the nice grammer tips! NT SWBTATTReg Jun 2018 #35
'destroying' pangaia Jun 2018 #20
I agree. Dems gotta dumb down the language so dopes on the other side can understand Pepsidog Jun 2018 #18
YES pangaia Jun 2018 #21
Sorry. Can't agree w/ this approach. It is insulting to say we OldHippieChick Jun 2018 #24
It gives me no pleasure to say we must dumb down. Actually it's very sad Pepsidog Jun 2018 #34
Yup BeyondGeography Jun 2018 #27
I agree. If I recall, when I read the constitution, and its amendments, as well as ... SWBTATTReg Jun 2018 #7
Good post with difficult questions. nt erronis Jun 2018 #9
".... one of the most corrupt elections in modern times .." pangaia Jun 2018 #22
I agree...its sure is starting to look this way... SWBTATTReg Jun 2018 #29
I never have any trouble True Blue American Jun 2018 #8
But he doesn;t need to talk to you, or me, or any other Americans with brains. pangaia Jun 2018 #23
That's the way it should be. So far, this President is above the law. Honeycombe8 Jun 2018 #10
A lot of people in charge at the moment think he is. Or they are willing to act like he wiggs Jun 2018 #11
. dalton99a Jun 2018 #16
Does not matter if the (broken) laws are not enforced Freethinker65 Jun 2018 #25
" Nobody is above the law. Not this President. Not any president." Yes... Stuart G Jun 2018 #30
Thank You Rep. Schiff, duforsure Jun 2018 #31
No, Trump can't pardon himself. The Constitution tells us so. Gothmog Jun 2018 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Adam Schiff nails it: No...»Reply #32