I heard a story on the radio nooz that disgusted me to my core. In Dallas today, a group of . . . .

[Blanks]

56. I never claimed that you had.

Where our discussion took off was that I was opposed to violating the civil rights of the restaurant owners. I just lumped advocating violence toward them as something else I don't support.

I never claimed that you advocated violence toward them.

I think if you were to read back through our discussion; you'd find that my position isn't all that different from yours.

I haven't eaten at Chick-fil-A because of their anti-civil union position, but I disagree with 'special' laws to prevent them from going into cities.

I expect that if we support 'special' laws they are just as likely to use them against a business that is pro-civil union in a community that is opposed to civil unions. I think that's the wrong approach to dealing with them.

I believe that's a violation of their rights and again, two wrongs don't make a right.